1 | (* *********************************************************************) |
---|
2 | (* *) |
---|
3 | (* The Compcert verified compiler *) |
---|
4 | (* *) |
---|
5 | (* Xavier Leroy, INRIA Paris-Rocquencourt *) |
---|
6 | (* *) |
---|
7 | (* Copyright Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en *) |
---|
8 | (* Automatique. All rights reserved. This file is distributed *) |
---|
9 | (* under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by *) |
---|
10 | (* the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the License, or *) |
---|
11 | (* (at your option) any later version. This file is also distributed *) |
---|
12 | (* under the terms of the INRIA Non-Commercial License Agreement. *) |
---|
13 | (* *) |
---|
14 | (* *********************************************************************) |
---|
15 | |
---|
16 | (* Formalizations of machine integers modulo $2^N$ #2<sup>N</sup>#. *) |
---|
17 | |
---|
18 | include "arithmetics/nat.ma". |
---|
19 | include "utilities/extranat.ma". |
---|
20 | |
---|
21 | include "ASM/BitVector.ma". |
---|
22 | include "ASM/Arithmetic.ma". |
---|
23 | |
---|
24 | (* * * Comparisons *) |
---|
25 | |
---|
26 | inductive comparison : Type[0] ≝ |
---|
27 | | Ceq : comparison (**r same *) |
---|
28 | | Cne : comparison (**r different *) |
---|
29 | | Clt : comparison (**r less than *) |
---|
30 | | Cle : comparison (**r less than or equal *) |
---|
31 | | Cgt : comparison (**r greater than *) |
---|
32 | | Cge : comparison. (**r greater than or equal *) |
---|
33 | |
---|
34 | definition negate_comparison : comparison → comparison ≝ λc. |
---|
35 | match c with |
---|
36 | [ Ceq ⇒ Cne |
---|
37 | | Cne ⇒ Ceq |
---|
38 | | Clt ⇒ Cge |
---|
39 | | Cle ⇒ Cgt |
---|
40 | | Cgt ⇒ Cle |
---|
41 | | Cge ⇒ Clt |
---|
42 | ]. |
---|
43 | |
---|
44 | definition swap_comparison : comparison → comparison ≝ λc. |
---|
45 | match c with |
---|
46 | [ Ceq ⇒ Ceq |
---|
47 | | Cne ⇒ Cne |
---|
48 | | Clt ⇒ Cgt |
---|
49 | | Cle ⇒ Cge |
---|
50 | | Cgt ⇒ Clt |
---|
51 | | Cge ⇒ Cle |
---|
52 | ]. |
---|
53 | (* |
---|
54 | (** * Parameterization by the word size, in bits. *) |
---|
55 | |
---|
56 | Module Type WORDSIZE. |
---|
57 | Variable wordsize: nat. |
---|
58 | Axiom wordsize_not_zero: wordsize <> 0%nat. |
---|
59 | End WORDSIZE. |
---|
60 | |
---|
61 | Module Make(WS: WORDSIZE). |
---|
62 | |
---|
63 | *) |
---|
64 | |
---|
65 | (*axiom two_power_nat : nat → Z.*) |
---|
66 | |
---|
67 | definition wordsize : nat ≝ 32. |
---|
68 | (* |
---|
69 | definition modulus : Z ≝ Z_two_power_nat wordsize. |
---|
70 | definition half_modulus : Z ≝ modulus / 2. |
---|
71 | definition max_unsigned : Z ≝ modulus - 1. |
---|
72 | definition max_signed : Z ≝ half_modulus - 1. |
---|
73 | definition min_signed : Z ≝ - half_modulus. |
---|
74 | |
---|
75 | lemma wordsize_pos: |
---|
76 | Z_of_nat wordsize > 0. |
---|
77 | normalize; //; qed. |
---|
78 | |
---|
79 | lemma modulus_power: |
---|
80 | modulus = two_p (Z_of_nat wordsize). |
---|
81 | //; qed. |
---|
82 | |
---|
83 | lemma modulus_pos: |
---|
84 | modulus > 0. |
---|
85 | //; qed. |
---|
86 | *) |
---|
87 | (* * Representation of machine integers *) |
---|
88 | |
---|
89 | (* A machine integer (type [int]) is represented as a Coq arbitrary-precision |
---|
90 | integer (type [Z]) plus a proof that it is in the range 0 (included) to |
---|
91 | [modulus] (excluded. *) |
---|
92 | |
---|
93 | definition int : Type[0] ≝ BitVector wordsize. |
---|
94 | (* |
---|
95 | definition intval: int → Z ≝ Z_of_unsigned_bitvector ?. |
---|
96 | definition intrange: ∀i:int. 0 ≤ (intval i) ∧ (intval i) < modulus. |
---|
97 | #i % whd in ⊢ (?%%) |
---|
98 | [ @bv_Z_unsigned_min |
---|
99 | | @bv_Z_unsigned_max |
---|
100 | ] qed. |
---|
101 | |
---|
102 | (* The [unsigned] and [signed] functions return the Coq integer corresponding |
---|
103 | to the given machine integer, interpreted as unsigned or signed |
---|
104 | respectively. *) |
---|
105 | |
---|
106 | definition unsigned : int → Z ≝ intval. |
---|
107 | |
---|
108 | definition signed : int → Z ≝ λn. |
---|
109 | if Zltb (unsigned n) half_modulus |
---|
110 | then unsigned n |
---|
111 | else unsigned n - modulus. |
---|
112 | *) |
---|
113 | (* Conversely, [repr] takes a Coq integer and returns the corresponding |
---|
114 | machine integer. The argument is treated modulo [modulus]. *) |
---|
115 | (* |
---|
116 | definition repr : Z → int ≝ λz. bitvector_of_Z wordsize z. |
---|
117 | *) |
---|
118 | definition repr : nat → int ≝ λn. bitvector_of_nat wordsize n. |
---|
119 | |
---|
120 | definition zero := repr 0. |
---|
121 | definition one := repr 1. |
---|
122 | definition mone := subtraction ? zero one. |
---|
123 | definition iwordsize := repr wordsize. |
---|
124 | |
---|
125 | lemma eq_dec: ∀x,y: int. (x = y) + (x ≠ y). |
---|
126 | #x #y lapply (refl ? (eq_bv ? x y)) cases (eq_bv ? x y) in ⊢ (???% → ?); #E |
---|
127 | [ %1 lapply E @(eq_bv_elim … x y) [ // | #_ #X destruct ] |
---|
128 | | %2 lapply E @(eq_bv_elim … x y) [ #_ #X destruct | /2/ ] |
---|
129 | ] qed. |
---|
130 | |
---|
131 | (* * Arithmetic and logical operations over machine integers *) |
---|
132 | |
---|
133 | definition eq : int → int → bool ≝ eq_bv wordsize. |
---|
134 | definition lt : int → int → bool ≝ lt_s wordsize. |
---|
135 | definition ltu : int → int → bool ≝ lt_u wordsize. |
---|
136 | |
---|
137 | definition neg : int → int ≝ two_complement_negation wordsize. |
---|
138 | definition mul ≝ λx,y. \snd (split ? wordsize wordsize (multiplication wordsize x y)). |
---|
139 | |
---|
140 | definition zero_ext_n : ∀w,n:nat. BitVector w → BitVector w ≝ |
---|
141 | λw,n. |
---|
142 | match nat_compare n w return λx,y.λ_. BitVector y → BitVector y with |
---|
143 | [ nat_lt n' w' ⇒ λi. |
---|
144 | let 〈h,l〉 ≝ split ? (S w') n' (switch_bv_plus ??? i) in |
---|
145 | switch_bv_plus ??? (pad ?? l) |
---|
146 | | _ ⇒ λi.i |
---|
147 | ]. |
---|
148 | |
---|
149 | definition zero_ext : nat → int → int ≝ zero_ext_n wordsize. |
---|
150 | |
---|
151 | definition sign_ext_n : ∀w,n:nat. BitVector w → BitVector w ≝ |
---|
152 | λw,n. |
---|
153 | match nat_compare n w return λx,y.λ_. BitVector y → BitVector y with |
---|
154 | [ nat_lt n' w' ⇒ λi. |
---|
155 | let 〈h,l〉 ≝ split ? (S w') n' (switch_bv_plus ??? i) in |
---|
156 | switch_bv_plus ??? (pad_vector ? (match l with [ VEmpty ⇒ false | VCons _ h _ ⇒ h ]) ?? l) |
---|
157 | | _ ⇒ λi.i |
---|
158 | ]. |
---|
159 | |
---|
160 | definition sign_ext : nat → int → int ≝ sign_ext_n wordsize. |
---|
161 | |
---|
162 | (* * Bitwise logical ``and'', ``or'' and ``xor'' operations. *) |
---|
163 | |
---|
164 | |
---|
165 | definition i_and : int → int → int ≝ conjunction_bv wordsize. |
---|
166 | definition or : int → int → int ≝ inclusive_disjunction_bv wordsize. |
---|
167 | definition xor : int → int → int ≝ exclusive_disjunction_bv wordsize. |
---|
168 | |
---|
169 | definition not : int → int ≝ negation_bv wordsize. |
---|
170 | |
---|
171 | (* * Shifts and rotates. *) |
---|
172 | |
---|
173 | definition shl : int → int → int ≝ λx,y. shift_left ?? (nat_of_bitvector … y) x false. |
---|
174 | definition shru : int → int → int ≝ λx,y. shift_right ?? (nat_of_bitvector … y) x false. |
---|
175 | |
---|
176 | (* * Arithmetic right shift is defined as signed division by a power of two. |
---|
177 | Two such shifts are defined: [shr] rounds towards minus infinity |
---|
178 | (standard behaviour for arithmetic right shift) and |
---|
179 | [shrx] rounds towards zero. *) |
---|
180 | |
---|
181 | definition shr : int → int → int ≝ λx,y. shift_right ?? (nat_of_bitvector … y) x (head' … x). |
---|
182 | definition shrx : int → int → int ≝ λx,y. |
---|
183 | match division_s ? x (shl one y) with [ None ⇒ zero | Some i ⇒ i ]. |
---|
184 | |
---|
185 | definition shr_carry ≝ λx,y: int. |
---|
186 | subtraction ? (shrx x y) (shr x y). |
---|
187 | |
---|
188 | definition rol : int → int → int ≝ λx,y. rotate_left ?? (nat_of_bitvector ? y) x. |
---|
189 | definition ror : int → int → int ≝ λx,y. rotate_right ?? (nat_of_bitvector ? y) x. |
---|
190 | |
---|
191 | definition rolm ≝ λx,a,m: int. i_and (rol x a) m. |
---|
192 | (* |
---|
193 | (** Decomposition of a number as a sum of powers of two. *) |
---|
194 | |
---|
195 | Fixpoint Z_one_bits (n: nat) (x: Z) (i: Z) {struct n}: list Z := |
---|
196 | match n with |
---|
197 | | O => nil |
---|
198 | | S m => |
---|
199 | let (b, y) := Z_bin_decomp x in |
---|
200 | if b then i :: Z_one_bits m y (i+1) else Z_one_bits m y (i+1) |
---|
201 | end. |
---|
202 | |
---|
203 | Definition one_bits (x: int) : list int := |
---|
204 | List.map repr (Z_one_bits wordsize (unsigned x) 0). |
---|
205 | |
---|
206 | (** Recognition of powers of two. *) |
---|
207 | |
---|
208 | Definition is_power2 (x: int) : option int := |
---|
209 | match Z_one_bits wordsize (unsigned x) 0 with |
---|
210 | | i :: nil => Some (repr i) |
---|
211 | | _ => None |
---|
212 | end. |
---|
213 | |
---|
214 | (** Recognition of integers that are acceptable as immediate operands |
---|
215 | to the [rlwim] PowerPC instruction. These integers are of the form |
---|
216 | [000011110000] or [111100001111], that is, a run of one bits |
---|
217 | surrounded by zero bits, or conversely. We recognize these integers by |
---|
218 | running the following automaton on the bits. The accepting states are |
---|
219 | 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. |
---|
220 | << |
---|
221 | 0 1 0 |
---|
222 | / \ / \ / \ |
---|
223 | \ / \ / \ / |
---|
224 | -0--> [1] --1--> [2] --0--> [3] |
---|
225 | / |
---|
226 | [0] |
---|
227 | \ |
---|
228 | -1--> [4] --0--> [5] --1--> [6] |
---|
229 | / \ / \ / \ |
---|
230 | \ / \ / \ / |
---|
231 | 1 0 1 |
---|
232 | >> |
---|
233 | *) |
---|
234 | |
---|
235 | Inductive rlw_state: Type := |
---|
236 | | RLW_S0 : rlw_state |
---|
237 | | RLW_S1 : rlw_state |
---|
238 | | RLW_S2 : rlw_state |
---|
239 | | RLW_S3 : rlw_state |
---|
240 | | RLW_S4 : rlw_state |
---|
241 | | RLW_S5 : rlw_state |
---|
242 | | RLW_S6 : rlw_state |
---|
243 | | RLW_Sbad : rlw_state. |
---|
244 | |
---|
245 | Definition rlw_transition (s: rlw_state) (b: bool) : rlw_state := |
---|
246 | match s, b with |
---|
247 | | RLW_S0, false => RLW_S1 |
---|
248 | | RLW_S0, true => RLW_S4 |
---|
249 | | RLW_S1, false => RLW_S1 |
---|
250 | | RLW_S1, true => RLW_S2 |
---|
251 | | RLW_S2, false => RLW_S3 |
---|
252 | | RLW_S2, true => RLW_S2 |
---|
253 | | RLW_S3, false => RLW_S3 |
---|
254 | | RLW_S3, true => RLW_Sbad |
---|
255 | | RLW_S4, false => RLW_S5 |
---|
256 | | RLW_S4, true => RLW_S4 |
---|
257 | | RLW_S5, false => RLW_S5 |
---|
258 | | RLW_S5, true => RLW_S6 |
---|
259 | | RLW_S6, false => RLW_Sbad |
---|
260 | | RLW_S6, true => RLW_S6 |
---|
261 | | RLW_Sbad, _ => RLW_Sbad |
---|
262 | end. |
---|
263 | |
---|
264 | Definition rlw_accepting (s: rlw_state) : bool := |
---|
265 | match s with |
---|
266 | | RLW_S0 => false |
---|
267 | | RLW_S1 => false |
---|
268 | | RLW_S2 => true |
---|
269 | | RLW_S3 => true |
---|
270 | | RLW_S4 => true |
---|
271 | | RLW_S5 => true |
---|
272 | | RLW_S6 => true |
---|
273 | | RLW_Sbad => false |
---|
274 | end. |
---|
275 | |
---|
276 | Fixpoint is_rlw_mask_rec (n: nat) (s: rlw_state) (x: Z) {struct n} : bool := |
---|
277 | match n with |
---|
278 | | O => |
---|
279 | rlw_accepting s |
---|
280 | | S m => |
---|
281 | let (b, y) := Z_bin_decomp x in |
---|
282 | is_rlw_mask_rec m (rlw_transition s b) y |
---|
283 | end. |
---|
284 | |
---|
285 | Definition is_rlw_mask (x: int) : bool := |
---|
286 | is_rlw_mask_rec wordsize RLW_S0 (unsigned x). |
---|
287 | *) |
---|
288 | (* * Comparisons. *) |
---|
289 | |
---|
290 | definition cmp : comparison → int → int → bool ≝ λc,x,y. |
---|
291 | match c with |
---|
292 | [ Ceq ⇒ eq x y |
---|
293 | | Cne ⇒ notb (eq x y) |
---|
294 | | Clt ⇒ lt x y |
---|
295 | | Cle ⇒ notb (lt y x) |
---|
296 | | Cgt ⇒ lt y x |
---|
297 | | Cge ⇒ notb (lt x y) |
---|
298 | ]. |
---|
299 | |
---|
300 | definition cmpu : comparison → int → int → bool ≝ λc,x,y. |
---|
301 | match c with |
---|
302 | [ Ceq ⇒ eq x y |
---|
303 | | Cne ⇒ notb (eq x y) |
---|
304 | | Clt ⇒ ltu x y |
---|
305 | | Cle ⇒ notb (ltu y x) |
---|
306 | | Cgt ⇒ ltu y x |
---|
307 | | Cge ⇒ notb (ltu x y) |
---|
308 | ]. |
---|
309 | |
---|
310 | definition is_false : int → Prop ≝ λx. x = zero. |
---|
311 | definition is_true : int → Prop ≝ λx. x ≠ zero. |
---|
312 | definition notbool : int → int ≝ λx. if eq x zero then one else zero. |
---|
313 | (* |
---|
314 | (** * Properties of integers and integer arithmetic *) |
---|
315 | |
---|
316 | (** ** Properties of [modulus], [max_unsigned], etc. *) |
---|
317 | |
---|
318 | Remark half_modulus_power: |
---|
319 | half_modulus = two_p (Z_of_nat wordsize - 1). |
---|
320 | Proof. |
---|
321 | unfold half_modulus. rewrite modulus_power. |
---|
322 | set (ws1 := Z_of_nat wordsize - 1). |
---|
323 | replace (Z_of_nat wordsize) with (Zsucc ws1). |
---|
324 | rewrite two_p_S. rewrite Zmult_comm. apply Z_div_mult. omega. |
---|
325 | unfold ws1. generalize wordsize_pos; omega. |
---|
326 | unfold ws1. omega. |
---|
327 | Qed. |
---|
328 | |
---|
329 | Remark half_modulus_modulus: modulus = 2 * half_modulus. |
---|
330 | Proof. |
---|
331 | rewrite half_modulus_power. rewrite modulus_power. |
---|
332 | rewrite <- two_p_S. decEq. omega. |
---|
333 | generalize wordsize_pos; omega. |
---|
334 | Qed. |
---|
335 | |
---|
336 | (** Relative positions, from greatest to smallest: |
---|
337 | << |
---|
338 | max_unsigned |
---|
339 | max_signed |
---|
340 | 2*wordsize-1 |
---|
341 | wordsize |
---|
342 | 0 |
---|
343 | min_signed |
---|
344 | >> |
---|
345 | *) |
---|
346 | |
---|
347 | Remark half_modulus_pos: half_modulus > 0. |
---|
348 | Proof. |
---|
349 | rewrite half_modulus_power. apply two_p_gt_ZERO. generalize wordsize_pos; omega. |
---|
350 | Qed. |
---|
351 | |
---|
352 | Remark min_signed_neg: min_signed < 0. |
---|
353 | Proof. |
---|
354 | unfold min_signed. generalize half_modulus_pos. omega. |
---|
355 | Qed. |
---|
356 | |
---|
357 | Remark max_signed_pos: max_signed >= 0. |
---|
358 | Proof. |
---|
359 | unfold max_signed. generalize half_modulus_pos. omega. |
---|
360 | Qed. |
---|
361 | |
---|
362 | Remark wordsize_max_unsigned: Z_of_nat wordsize <= max_unsigned. |
---|
363 | Proof. |
---|
364 | assert (Z_of_nat wordsize < modulus). |
---|
365 | rewrite modulus_power. apply two_p_strict. |
---|
366 | generalize wordsize_pos. omega. |
---|
367 | unfold max_unsigned. omega. |
---|
368 | Qed. |
---|
369 | |
---|
370 | Remark two_wordsize_max_unsigned: 2 * Z_of_nat wordsize - 1 <= max_unsigned. |
---|
371 | Proof. |
---|
372 | assert (2 * Z_of_nat wordsize - 1 < modulus). |
---|
373 | rewrite modulus_power. apply two_p_strict_2. generalize wordsize_pos; omega. |
---|
374 | unfold max_unsigned; omega. |
---|
375 | Qed. |
---|
376 | |
---|
377 | Remark max_signed_unsigned: max_signed < max_unsigned. |
---|
378 | Proof. |
---|
379 | unfold max_signed, max_unsigned. rewrite half_modulus_modulus. |
---|
380 | generalize half_modulus_pos. omega. |
---|
381 | Qed. |
---|
382 | |
---|
383 | (** ** Properties of zero, one, minus one *) |
---|
384 | |
---|
385 | Theorem unsigned_zero: unsigned zero = 0. |
---|
386 | Proof. |
---|
387 | simpl. apply Zmod_0_l. |
---|
388 | Qed. |
---|
389 | |
---|
390 | Theorem unsigned_one: unsigned one = 1. |
---|
391 | Proof. |
---|
392 | simpl. apply Zmod_small. split. omega. |
---|
393 | unfold modulus. replace wordsize with (S(pred wordsize)). |
---|
394 | rewrite two_power_nat_S. generalize (two_power_nat_pos (pred wordsize)). |
---|
395 | omega. |
---|
396 | generalize wordsize_pos. omega. |
---|
397 | Qed. |
---|
398 | |
---|
399 | Theorem unsigned_mone: unsigned mone = modulus - 1. |
---|
400 | Proof. |
---|
401 | simpl unsigned. |
---|
402 | replace (-1) with ((modulus - 1) + (-1) * modulus). |
---|
403 | rewrite Z_mod_plus_full. apply Zmod_small. |
---|
404 | generalize modulus_pos. omega. omega. |
---|
405 | Qed. |
---|
406 | |
---|
407 | Theorem signed_zero: signed zero = 0. |
---|
408 | Proof. |
---|
409 | unfold signed. rewrite unsigned_zero. apply zlt_true. generalize half_modulus_pos; omega. |
---|
410 | Qed. |
---|
411 | |
---|
412 | Theorem signed_mone: signed mone = -1. |
---|
413 | Proof. |
---|
414 | unfold signed. rewrite unsigned_mone. |
---|
415 | rewrite zlt_false. omega. |
---|
416 | rewrite half_modulus_modulus. generalize half_modulus_pos. omega. |
---|
417 | Qed. |
---|
418 | *) |
---|
419 | theorem one_not_zero: one ≠ zero. |
---|
420 | % #H @(match eq_dec one zero return λx.match x with [ inl _ ⇒ True | inr _ ⇒ False ] with [ inl _ ⇒ I | inr p ⇒ ?]) normalize |
---|
421 | cases p #H' @(H' H) |
---|
422 | qed. |
---|
423 | |
---|
424 | (* |
---|
425 | Theorem unsigned_repr_wordsize: |
---|
426 | unsigned iwordsize = Z_of_nat wordsize. |
---|
427 | Proof. |
---|
428 | simpl. apply Zmod_small. |
---|
429 | generalize wordsize_pos wordsize_max_unsigned; unfold max_unsigned; omega. |
---|
430 | Qed. |
---|
431 | *) |
---|
432 | (* * ** Properties of equality *) |
---|
433 | |
---|
434 | theorem eq_sym: |
---|
435 | ∀x,y. eq x y = eq y x. |
---|
436 | #x #y change with (eq_bv ??? = eq_bv ???) |
---|
437 | @eq_bv_elim @eq_bv_elim /2/ |
---|
438 | qed. |
---|
439 | |
---|
440 | theorem eq_spec: ∀x,y: int. if eq x y then x = y else (x ≠ y). |
---|
441 | #x #y change with (if eq_bv ? x y then ? else ?) @eq_bv_elim #H @H qed. |
---|
442 | |
---|
443 | theorem eq_true: ∀x. eq x x = true. |
---|
444 | #x lapply (eq_spec x x); elim (eq x x); //; |
---|
445 | #H normalize in H; @False_ind @(absurd ? (refl ??) H) |
---|
446 | qed. |
---|
447 | |
---|
448 | theorem eq_false: ∀x,y. x ≠ y → eq x y = false. |
---|
449 | #x #y lapply (eq_spec x y); elim (eq x y); //; |
---|
450 | #H #H' @False_ind @(absurd ? H H') |
---|
451 | qed. |
---|
452 | (* |
---|
453 | (** ** Modulo arithmetic *) |
---|
454 | |
---|
455 | (** We define and state properties of equality and arithmetic modulo a |
---|
456 | positive integer. *) |
---|
457 | |
---|
458 | Section EQ_MODULO. |
---|
459 | |
---|
460 | Variable modul: Z. |
---|
461 | Hypothesis modul_pos: modul > 0. |
---|
462 | |
---|
463 | Definition eqmod (x y: Z) : Prop := exists k, x = k * modul + y. |
---|
464 | |
---|
465 | Lemma eqmod_refl: forall x, eqmod x x. |
---|
466 | Proof. |
---|
467 | intros; red. exists 0. omega. |
---|
468 | Qed. |
---|
469 | |
---|
470 | Lemma eqmod_refl2: forall x y, x = y -> eqmod x y. |
---|
471 | Proof. |
---|
472 | intros. subst y. apply eqmod_refl. |
---|
473 | Qed. |
---|
474 | |
---|
475 | Lemma eqmod_sym: forall x y, eqmod x y -> eqmod y x. |
---|
476 | Proof. |
---|
477 | intros x y [k EQ]; red. exists (-k). subst x. ring. |
---|
478 | Qed. |
---|
479 | |
---|
480 | Lemma eqmod_trans: forall x y z, eqmod x y -> eqmod y z -> eqmod x z. |
---|
481 | Proof. |
---|
482 | intros x y z [k1 EQ1] [k2 EQ2]; red. |
---|
483 | exists (k1 + k2). subst x; subst y. ring. |
---|
484 | Qed. |
---|
485 | |
---|
486 | Lemma eqmod_small_eq: |
---|
487 | forall x y, eqmod x y -> 0 <= x < modul -> 0 <= y < modul -> x = y. |
---|
488 | Proof. |
---|
489 | intros x y [k EQ] I1 I2. |
---|
490 | generalize (Zdiv_unique _ _ _ _ EQ I2). intro. |
---|
491 | rewrite (Zdiv_small x modul I1) in H. subst k. omega. |
---|
492 | Qed. |
---|
493 | |
---|
494 | Lemma eqmod_mod_eq: |
---|
495 | forall x y, eqmod x y -> x mod modul = y mod modul. |
---|
496 | Proof. |
---|
497 | intros x y [k EQ]. subst x. |
---|
498 | rewrite Zplus_comm. apply Z_mod_plus. auto. |
---|
499 | Qed. |
---|
500 | |
---|
501 | Lemma eqmod_mod: |
---|
502 | forall x, eqmod x (x mod modul). |
---|
503 | Proof. |
---|
504 | intros; red. exists (x / modul). |
---|
505 | rewrite Zmult_comm. apply Z_div_mod_eq. auto. |
---|
506 | Qed. |
---|
507 | |
---|
508 | Lemma eqmod_add: |
---|
509 | forall a b c d, eqmod a b -> eqmod c d -> eqmod (a + c) (b + d). |
---|
510 | Proof. |
---|
511 | intros a b c d [k1 EQ1] [k2 EQ2]; red. |
---|
512 | subst a; subst c. exists (k1 + k2). ring. |
---|
513 | Qed. |
---|
514 | |
---|
515 | Lemma eqmod_neg: |
---|
516 | forall x y, eqmod x y -> eqmod (-x) (-y). |
---|
517 | Proof. |
---|
518 | intros x y [k EQ]; red. exists (-k). rewrite EQ. ring. |
---|
519 | Qed. |
---|
520 | |
---|
521 | Lemma eqmod_sub: |
---|
522 | forall a b c d, eqmod a b -> eqmod c d -> eqmod (a - c) (b - d). |
---|
523 | Proof. |
---|
524 | intros a b c d [k1 EQ1] [k2 EQ2]; red. |
---|
525 | subst a; subst c. exists (k1 - k2). ring. |
---|
526 | Qed. |
---|
527 | |
---|
528 | Lemma eqmod_mult: |
---|
529 | forall a b c d, eqmod a c -> eqmod b d -> eqmod (a * b) (c * d). |
---|
530 | Proof. |
---|
531 | intros a b c d [k1 EQ1] [k2 EQ2]; red. |
---|
532 | subst a; subst b. |
---|
533 | exists (k1 * k2 * modul + c * k2 + k1 * d). |
---|
534 | ring. |
---|
535 | Qed. |
---|
536 | |
---|
537 | End EQ_MODULO. |
---|
538 | |
---|
539 | Lemma eqmod_divides: |
---|
540 | forall n m x y, eqmod n x y -> Zdivide m n -> eqmod m x y. |
---|
541 | Proof. |
---|
542 | intros. destruct H as [k1 EQ1]. destruct H0 as [k2 EQ2]. |
---|
543 | exists (k1*k2). rewrite <- Zmult_assoc. rewrite <- EQ2. auto. |
---|
544 | Qed. |
---|
545 | |
---|
546 | (** We then specialize these definitions to equality modulo |
---|
547 | $2^{wordsize}$ #2<sup>wordsize</sup>#. *) |
---|
548 | |
---|
549 | Hint Resolve modulus_pos: ints. |
---|
550 | |
---|
551 | Definition eqm := eqmod modulus. |
---|
552 | |
---|
553 | Lemma eqm_refl: forall x, eqm x x. |
---|
554 | Proof (eqmod_refl modulus). |
---|
555 | Hint Resolve eqm_refl: ints. |
---|
556 | |
---|
557 | Lemma eqm_refl2: |
---|
558 | forall x y, x = y -> eqm x y. |
---|
559 | Proof (eqmod_refl2 modulus). |
---|
560 | Hint Resolve eqm_refl2: ints. |
---|
561 | |
---|
562 | Lemma eqm_sym: forall x y, eqm x y -> eqm y x. |
---|
563 | Proof (eqmod_sym modulus). |
---|
564 | Hint Resolve eqm_sym: ints. |
---|
565 | |
---|
566 | Lemma eqm_trans: forall x y z, eqm x y -> eqm y z -> eqm x z. |
---|
567 | Proof (eqmod_trans modulus). |
---|
568 | Hint Resolve eqm_trans: ints. |
---|
569 | |
---|
570 | Lemma eqm_samerepr: forall x y, eqm x y -> repr x = repr y. |
---|
571 | Proof. |
---|
572 | intros. unfold repr. apply mkint_eq. |
---|
573 | apply eqmod_mod_eq. auto with ints. exact H. |
---|
574 | Qed. |
---|
575 | |
---|
576 | Lemma eqm_small_eq: |
---|
577 | forall x y, eqm x y -> 0 <= x < modulus -> 0 <= y < modulus -> x = y. |
---|
578 | Proof (eqmod_small_eq modulus). |
---|
579 | Hint Resolve eqm_small_eq: ints. |
---|
580 | |
---|
581 | Lemma eqm_add: |
---|
582 | forall a b c d, eqm a b -> eqm c d -> eqm (a + c) (b + d). |
---|
583 | Proof (eqmod_add modulus). |
---|
584 | Hint Resolve eqm_add: ints. |
---|
585 | |
---|
586 | Lemma eqm_neg: |
---|
587 | forall x y, eqm x y -> eqm (-x) (-y). |
---|
588 | Proof (eqmod_neg modulus). |
---|
589 | Hint Resolve eqm_neg: ints. |
---|
590 | |
---|
591 | Lemma eqm_sub: |
---|
592 | forall a b c d, eqm a b -> eqm c d -> eqm (a - c) (b - d). |
---|
593 | Proof (eqmod_sub modulus). |
---|
594 | Hint Resolve eqm_sub: ints. |
---|
595 | |
---|
596 | Lemma eqm_mult: |
---|
597 | forall a b c d, eqm a c -> eqm b d -> eqm (a * b) (c * d). |
---|
598 | Proof (eqmod_mult modulus). |
---|
599 | Hint Resolve eqm_mult: ints. |
---|
600 | |
---|
601 | (** ** Properties of the coercions between [Z] and [int] *) |
---|
602 | |
---|
603 | Lemma eqm_unsigned_repr: |
---|
604 | forall z, eqm z (unsigned (repr z)). |
---|
605 | Proof. |
---|
606 | unfold eqm, repr, unsigned; intros; simpl. |
---|
607 | apply eqmod_mod. auto with ints. |
---|
608 | Qed. |
---|
609 | Hint Resolve eqm_unsigned_repr: ints. |
---|
610 | |
---|
611 | Lemma eqm_unsigned_repr_l: |
---|
612 | forall a b, eqm a b -> eqm (unsigned (repr a)) b. |
---|
613 | Proof. |
---|
614 | intros. apply eqm_trans with a. |
---|
615 | apply eqm_sym. apply eqm_unsigned_repr. auto. |
---|
616 | Qed. |
---|
617 | Hint Resolve eqm_unsigned_repr_l: ints. |
---|
618 | |
---|
619 | Lemma eqm_unsigned_repr_r: |
---|
620 | forall a b, eqm a b -> eqm a (unsigned (repr b)). |
---|
621 | Proof. |
---|
622 | intros. apply eqm_trans with b. auto. |
---|
623 | apply eqm_unsigned_repr. |
---|
624 | Qed. |
---|
625 | Hint Resolve eqm_unsigned_repr_r: ints. |
---|
626 | |
---|
627 | Lemma eqm_signed_unsigned: |
---|
628 | forall x, eqm (signed x) (unsigned x). |
---|
629 | Proof. |
---|
630 | intro; red; unfold signed. set (y := unsigned x). |
---|
631 | case (zlt y half_modulus); intro. |
---|
632 | apply eqmod_refl. red; exists (-1); ring. |
---|
633 | Qed. |
---|
634 | *) |
---|
635 | (* |
---|
636 | theorem unsigned_range: ∀i. 0 ≤ unsigned i ∧ unsigned i < modulus. |
---|
637 | #i @intrange |
---|
638 | qed. |
---|
639 | |
---|
640 | theorem unsigned_range_2: |
---|
641 | ∀i. 0 ≤ unsigned i ∧ unsigned i ≤ max_unsigned. |
---|
642 | #i >(?:max_unsigned = modulus - 1) //; (* unfold *) |
---|
643 | lapply (unsigned_range i); *; #Hz #Hm % |
---|
644 | [ //; |
---|
645 | | <(Zpred_Zsucc (unsigned i)) |
---|
646 | <(Zpred_Zplus_neg_O modulus) |
---|
647 | @monotonic_Zle_Zpred |
---|
648 | /2/; |
---|
649 | ] qed. |
---|
650 | |
---|
651 | axiom signed_range: |
---|
652 | ∀i. min_signed ≤ signed i ∧ signed i ≤ max_signed. |
---|
653 | (* |
---|
654 | #i whd in ⊢ (?(??%)(?%?)); |
---|
655 | lapply (unsigned_range i); *; letin n ≝ (unsigned i); #H1 #H2 |
---|
656 | @(Zltb_elim_Type0) #H3 |
---|
657 | [ % [ @(transitive_Zle ? OZ) //; |
---|
658 | | <(Zpred_Zsucc n) |
---|
659 | <(Zpred_Zplus_neg_O half_modulus) |
---|
660 | @monotonic_Zle_Zpred /2/; |
---|
661 | ] |
---|
662 | | % [ >half_modulus_modulus |
---|
663 | |
---|
664 | Theorem signed_range: |
---|
665 | forall i, min_signed <= signed i <= max_signed. |
---|
666 | Proof. |
---|
667 | intros. unfold signed. |
---|
668 | generalize (unsigned_range i). set (n := unsigned i). intros. |
---|
669 | case (zlt n half_modulus); intro. |
---|
670 | unfold max_signed. generalize min_signed_neg. omega. |
---|
671 | unfold min_signed, max_signed. |
---|
672 | rewrite half_modulus_modulus in *. omega. |
---|
673 | Qed. |
---|
674 | |
---|
675 | Theorem repr_unsigned: |
---|
676 | forall i, repr (unsigned i) = i. |
---|
677 | Proof. |
---|
678 | destruct i; simpl. unfold repr. apply mkint_eq. |
---|
679 | apply Zmod_small. auto. |
---|
680 | Qed. |
---|
681 | Hint Resolve repr_unsigned: ints. |
---|
682 | |
---|
683 | Lemma repr_signed: |
---|
684 | forall i, repr (signed i) = i. |
---|
685 | Proof. |
---|
686 | intros. transitivity (repr (unsigned i)). |
---|
687 | apply eqm_samerepr. apply eqm_signed_unsigned. auto with ints. |
---|
688 | Qed. |
---|
689 | Hint Resolve repr_signed: ints. |
---|
690 | |
---|
691 | Theorem unsigned_repr: |
---|
692 | forall z, 0 <= z <= max_unsigned -> unsigned (repr z) = z. |
---|
693 | Proof. |
---|
694 | intros. unfold repr, unsigned; simpl. |
---|
695 | apply Zmod_small. unfold max_unsigned in H. omega. |
---|
696 | Qed. |
---|
697 | Hint Resolve unsigned_repr: ints. |
---|
698 | *) |
---|
699 | axiom signed_repr: |
---|
700 | ∀z. min_signed ≤ z ∧ z ≤ max_signed → signed (repr z) = z. |
---|
701 | (* |
---|
702 | Theorem signed_repr: |
---|
703 | forall z, min_signed <= z <= max_signed -> signed (repr z) = z. |
---|
704 | Proof. |
---|
705 | intros. unfold signed. case (zle 0 z); intro. |
---|
706 | replace (unsigned (repr z)) with z. |
---|
707 | rewrite zlt_true. auto. unfold max_signed in H. omega. |
---|
708 | symmetry. apply unsigned_repr. generalize max_signed_unsigned. omega. |
---|
709 | pose (z' := z + modulus). |
---|
710 | replace (repr z) with (repr z'). |
---|
711 | replace (unsigned (repr z')) with z'. |
---|
712 | rewrite zlt_false. unfold z'. omega. |
---|
713 | unfold z'. unfold min_signed in H. |
---|
714 | rewrite half_modulus_modulus. omega. |
---|
715 | symmetry. apply unsigned_repr. |
---|
716 | unfold z', max_unsigned. unfold min_signed, max_signed in H. |
---|
717 | rewrite half_modulus_modulus. omega. |
---|
718 | apply eqm_samerepr. unfold z'; red. exists 1. omega. |
---|
719 | Qed. |
---|
720 | |
---|
721 | Theorem signed_eq_unsigned: |
---|
722 | forall x, unsigned x <= max_signed -> signed x = unsigned x. |
---|
723 | Proof. |
---|
724 | intros. unfold signed. destruct (zlt (unsigned x) half_modulus). |
---|
725 | auto. unfold max_signed in H. omegaContradiction. |
---|
726 | Qed. |
---|
727 | |
---|
728 | (** ** Properties of addition *) |
---|
729 | |
---|
730 | *) |
---|
731 | axiom add_unsigned: ∀x,y. add x y = repr (unsigned x + unsigned y). |
---|
732 | axiom add_signed: ∀x,y. add x y = repr (signed x + signed y). |
---|
733 | axiom add_zero: ∀x. add x zero = x. |
---|
734 | |
---|
735 | (* |
---|
736 | Theorem add_unsigned: forall x y, add x y = repr (unsigned x + unsigned y). |
---|
737 | Proof. intros; reflexivity. |
---|
738 | Qed. |
---|
739 | |
---|
740 | Theorem add_signed: forall x y, add x y = repr (signed x + signed y). |
---|
741 | Proof. |
---|
742 | intros. rewrite add_unsigned. apply eqm_samerepr. |
---|
743 | apply eqm_add; apply eqm_sym; apply eqm_signed_unsigned. |
---|
744 | Qed. |
---|
745 | |
---|
746 | Theorem add_commut: forall x y, add x y = add y x. |
---|
747 | Proof. intros; unfold add. decEq. omega. Qed. |
---|
748 | |
---|
749 | Theorem add_zero: forall x, add x zero = x. |
---|
750 | Proof. |
---|
751 | intros; unfold add, zero. change (unsigned (repr 0)) with 0. |
---|
752 | rewrite Zplus_0_r. apply repr_unsigned. |
---|
753 | Qed. |
---|
754 | |
---|
755 | Theorem add_assoc: forall x y z, add (add x y) z = add x (add y z). |
---|
756 | Proof. |
---|
757 | intros; unfold add. |
---|
758 | set (x' := unsigned x). |
---|
759 | set (y' := unsigned y). |
---|
760 | set (z' := unsigned z). |
---|
761 | apply eqm_samerepr. |
---|
762 | apply eqm_trans with ((x' + y') + z'). |
---|
763 | auto with ints. |
---|
764 | rewrite <- Zplus_assoc. auto with ints. |
---|
765 | Qed. |
---|
766 | |
---|
767 | Theorem add_permut: forall x y z, add x (add y z) = add y (add x z). |
---|
768 | Proof. |
---|
769 | intros. rewrite (add_commut y z). rewrite <- add_assoc. apply add_commut. |
---|
770 | Qed. |
---|
771 | |
---|
772 | Theorem add_neg_zero: forall x, add x (neg x) = zero. |
---|
773 | Proof. |
---|
774 | intros; unfold add, neg, zero. apply eqm_samerepr. |
---|
775 | replace 0 with (unsigned x + (- (unsigned x))). |
---|
776 | auto with ints. omega. |
---|
777 | Qed. |
---|
778 | |
---|
779 | (** ** Properties of negation *) |
---|
780 | |
---|
781 | Theorem neg_repr: forall z, neg (repr z) = repr (-z). |
---|
782 | Proof. |
---|
783 | intros; unfold neg. apply eqm_samerepr. auto with ints. |
---|
784 | Qed. |
---|
785 | |
---|
786 | Theorem neg_zero: neg zero = zero. |
---|
787 | Proof. |
---|
788 | unfold neg, zero. compute. apply mkint_eq. auto. |
---|
789 | Qed. |
---|
790 | |
---|
791 | Theorem neg_involutive: forall x, neg (neg x) = x. |
---|
792 | Proof. |
---|
793 | intros; unfold neg. transitivity (repr (unsigned x)). |
---|
794 | apply eqm_samerepr. apply eqm_trans with (- (- (unsigned x))). |
---|
795 | apply eqm_neg. apply eqm_unsigned_repr_l. apply eqm_refl. |
---|
796 | apply eqm_refl2. omega. apply repr_unsigned. |
---|
797 | Qed. |
---|
798 | |
---|
799 | Theorem neg_add_distr: forall x y, neg(add x y) = add (neg x) (neg y). |
---|
800 | Proof. |
---|
801 | intros; unfold neg, add. apply eqm_samerepr. |
---|
802 | apply eqm_trans with (- (unsigned x + unsigned y)). |
---|
803 | auto with ints. |
---|
804 | replace (- (unsigned x + unsigned y)) |
---|
805 | with ((- unsigned x) + (- unsigned y)). |
---|
806 | auto with ints. omega. |
---|
807 | Qed. |
---|
808 | |
---|
809 | (** ** Properties of subtraction *) |
---|
810 | |
---|
811 | Theorem sub_zero_l: forall x, sub x zero = x. |
---|
812 | Proof. |
---|
813 | intros; unfold sub. change (unsigned zero) with 0. |
---|
814 | replace (unsigned x - 0) with (unsigned x). apply repr_unsigned. |
---|
815 | omega. |
---|
816 | Qed. |
---|
817 | |
---|
818 | Theorem sub_zero_r: forall x, sub zero x = neg x. |
---|
819 | Proof. |
---|
820 | intros; unfold sub, neg. change (unsigned zero) with 0. |
---|
821 | replace (0 - unsigned x) with (- unsigned x). auto. |
---|
822 | omega. |
---|
823 | Qed. |
---|
824 | |
---|
825 | Theorem sub_add_opp: forall x y, sub x y = add x (neg y). |
---|
826 | Proof. |
---|
827 | intros; unfold sub, add, neg. |
---|
828 | replace (unsigned x - unsigned y) |
---|
829 | with (unsigned x + (- unsigned y)). |
---|
830 | apply eqm_samerepr. auto with ints. omega. |
---|
831 | Qed. |
---|
832 | |
---|
833 | Theorem sub_idem: forall x, sub x x = zero. |
---|
834 | Proof. |
---|
835 | intros; unfold sub. replace (unsigned x - unsigned x) with 0. |
---|
836 | reflexivity. omega. |
---|
837 | Qed. |
---|
838 | |
---|
839 | Theorem sub_add_l: forall x y z, sub (add x y) z = add (sub x z) y. |
---|
840 | Proof. |
---|
841 | intros. repeat rewrite sub_add_opp. |
---|
842 | repeat rewrite add_assoc. decEq. apply add_commut. |
---|
843 | Qed. |
---|
844 | |
---|
845 | Theorem sub_add_r: forall x y z, sub x (add y z) = add (sub x z) (neg y). |
---|
846 | Proof. |
---|
847 | intros. repeat rewrite sub_add_opp. |
---|
848 | rewrite neg_add_distr. rewrite add_permut. apply add_commut. |
---|
849 | Qed. |
---|
850 | |
---|
851 | Theorem sub_shifted: |
---|
852 | forall x y z, |
---|
853 | sub (add x z) (add y z) = sub x y. |
---|
854 | Proof. |
---|
855 | intros. rewrite sub_add_opp. rewrite neg_add_distr. |
---|
856 | rewrite add_assoc. |
---|
857 | rewrite (add_commut (neg y) (neg z)). |
---|
858 | rewrite <- (add_assoc z). rewrite add_neg_zero. |
---|
859 | rewrite (add_commut zero). rewrite add_zero. |
---|
860 | symmetry. apply sub_add_opp. |
---|
861 | Qed. |
---|
862 | |
---|
863 | Theorem sub_signed: |
---|
864 | forall x y, sub x y = repr (signed x - signed y). |
---|
865 | Proof. |
---|
866 | intros. unfold sub. apply eqm_samerepr. |
---|
867 | apply eqm_sub; apply eqm_sym; apply eqm_signed_unsigned. |
---|
868 | Qed. |
---|
869 | |
---|
870 | (** ** Properties of multiplication *) |
---|
871 | |
---|
872 | Theorem mul_commut: forall x y, mul x y = mul y x. |
---|
873 | Proof. |
---|
874 | intros; unfold mul. decEq. ring. |
---|
875 | Qed. |
---|
876 | |
---|
877 | Theorem mul_zero: forall x, mul x zero = zero. |
---|
878 | Proof. |
---|
879 | intros; unfold mul. change (unsigned zero) with 0. |
---|
880 | unfold zero. decEq. ring. |
---|
881 | Qed. |
---|
882 | |
---|
883 | Theorem mul_one: forall x, mul x one = x. |
---|
884 | Proof. |
---|
885 | intros; unfold mul. rewrite unsigned_one. |
---|
886 | transitivity (repr (unsigned x)). decEq. ring. |
---|
887 | apply repr_unsigned. |
---|
888 | Qed. |
---|
889 | |
---|
890 | Theorem mul_assoc: forall x y z, mul (mul x y) z = mul x (mul y z). |
---|
891 | Proof. |
---|
892 | intros; unfold mul. |
---|
893 | set (x' := unsigned x). |
---|
894 | set (y' := unsigned y). |
---|
895 | set (z' := unsigned z). |
---|
896 | apply eqm_samerepr. apply eqm_trans with ((x' * y') * z'). |
---|
897 | auto with ints. |
---|
898 | rewrite <- Zmult_assoc. auto with ints. |
---|
899 | Qed. |
---|
900 | |
---|
901 | Theorem mul_add_distr_l: |
---|
902 | forall x y z, mul (add x y) z = add (mul x z) (mul y z). |
---|
903 | Proof. |
---|
904 | intros; unfold mul, add. |
---|
905 | apply eqm_samerepr. |
---|
906 | set (x' := unsigned x). |
---|
907 | set (y' := unsigned y). |
---|
908 | set (z' := unsigned z). |
---|
909 | apply eqm_trans with ((x' + y') * z'). |
---|
910 | auto with ints. |
---|
911 | replace ((x' + y') * z') with (x' * z' + y' * z'). |
---|
912 | auto with ints. |
---|
913 | ring. |
---|
914 | Qed. |
---|
915 | |
---|
916 | Theorem mul_add_distr_r: |
---|
917 | forall x y z, mul x (add y z) = add (mul x y) (mul x z). |
---|
918 | Proof. |
---|
919 | intros. rewrite mul_commut. rewrite mul_add_distr_l. |
---|
920 | decEq; apply mul_commut. |
---|
921 | Qed. |
---|
922 | |
---|
923 | Theorem neg_mul_distr_l: |
---|
924 | forall x y, neg(mul x y) = mul (neg x) y. |
---|
925 | Proof. |
---|
926 | intros. unfold mul, neg. |
---|
927 | set (x' := unsigned x). set (y' := unsigned y). |
---|
928 | apply eqm_samerepr. apply eqm_trans with (- (x' * y')). |
---|
929 | auto with ints. |
---|
930 | replace (- (x' * y')) with ((-x') * y') by ring. |
---|
931 | auto with ints. |
---|
932 | Qed. |
---|
933 | |
---|
934 | Theorem neg_mul_distr_r: |
---|
935 | forall x y, neg(mul x y) = mul x (neg y). |
---|
936 | Proof. |
---|
937 | intros. rewrite (mul_commut x y). rewrite (mul_commut x (neg y)). |
---|
938 | apply neg_mul_distr_l. |
---|
939 | Qed. |
---|
940 | |
---|
941 | Theorem mul_signed: |
---|
942 | forall x y, mul x y = repr (signed x * signed y). |
---|
943 | Proof. |
---|
944 | intros; unfold mul. apply eqm_samerepr. |
---|
945 | apply eqm_mult; apply eqm_sym; apply eqm_signed_unsigned. |
---|
946 | Qed. |
---|
947 | |
---|
948 | (** ** Properties of binary decompositions *) |
---|
949 | |
---|
950 | Lemma Z_shift_add_bin_decomp: |
---|
951 | forall x, |
---|
952 | Z_shift_add (fst (Z_bin_decomp x)) (snd (Z_bin_decomp x)) = x. |
---|
953 | Proof. |
---|
954 | destruct x; simpl. |
---|
955 | auto. |
---|
956 | destruct p; reflexivity. |
---|
957 | destruct p; try reflexivity. simpl. |
---|
958 | assert (forall z, 2 * (z + 1) - 1 = 2 * z + 1). intro; omega. |
---|
959 | generalize (H (Zpos p)); simpl. congruence. |
---|
960 | Qed. |
---|
961 | |
---|
962 | Lemma Z_shift_add_inj: |
---|
963 | forall b1 x1 b2 x2, |
---|
964 | Z_shift_add b1 x1 = Z_shift_add b2 x2 -> b1 = b2 /\ x1 = x2. |
---|
965 | Proof. |
---|
966 | intros until x2. |
---|
967 | unfold Z_shift_add. |
---|
968 | destruct b1; destruct b2; intros; |
---|
969 | ((split; [reflexivity|omega]) || omegaContradiction). |
---|
970 | Qed. |
---|
971 | |
---|
972 | Lemma Z_of_bits_exten: |
---|
973 | forall n f1 f2, |
---|
974 | (forall z, 0 <= z < Z_of_nat n -> f1 z = f2 z) -> |
---|
975 | Z_of_bits n f1 = Z_of_bits n f2. |
---|
976 | Proof. |
---|
977 | induction n; intros. |
---|
978 | reflexivity. |
---|
979 | simpl. rewrite inj_S in H. decEq. apply H. omega. |
---|
980 | apply IHn. intros; apply H. omega. |
---|
981 | Qed. |
---|
982 | |
---|
983 | Opaque Zmult. |
---|
984 | |
---|
985 | Lemma Z_of_bits_of_Z: |
---|
986 | forall x, eqm (Z_of_bits wordsize (bits_of_Z wordsize x)) x. |
---|
987 | Proof. |
---|
988 | assert (forall n x, exists k, |
---|
989 | Z_of_bits n (bits_of_Z n x) = k * two_power_nat n + x). |
---|
990 | induction n; intros. |
---|
991 | rewrite two_power_nat_O. simpl. exists (-x). omega. |
---|
992 | rewrite two_power_nat_S. simpl. |
---|
993 | caseEq (Z_bin_decomp x). intros b y ZBD. simpl. |
---|
994 | replace (Z_of_bits n (fun i => if zeq (i + 1) 0 then b else bits_of_Z n y (i + 1 - 1))) |
---|
995 | with (Z_of_bits n (bits_of_Z n y)). |
---|
996 | elim (IHn y). intros k1 EQ1. rewrite EQ1. |
---|
997 | rewrite <- (Z_shift_add_bin_decomp x). |
---|
998 | rewrite ZBD. simpl. |
---|
999 | exists k1. |
---|
1000 | case b; unfold Z_shift_add; ring. |
---|
1001 | apply Z_of_bits_exten. intros. |
---|
1002 | rewrite zeq_false. decEq. omega. omega. |
---|
1003 | intro. exact (H wordsize x). |
---|
1004 | Qed. |
---|
1005 | |
---|
1006 | Lemma bits_of_Z_zero: |
---|
1007 | forall n x, bits_of_Z n 0 x = false. |
---|
1008 | Proof. |
---|
1009 | induction n; simpl; intros. |
---|
1010 | auto. |
---|
1011 | case (zeq x 0); intro. auto. auto. |
---|
1012 | Qed. |
---|
1013 | |
---|
1014 | Remark Z_bin_decomp_2xm1: |
---|
1015 | forall x, Z_bin_decomp (2 * x - 1) = (true, x - 1). |
---|
1016 | Proof. |
---|
1017 | intros. caseEq (Z_bin_decomp (2 * x - 1)). intros b y EQ. |
---|
1018 | generalize (Z_shift_add_bin_decomp (2 * x - 1)). |
---|
1019 | rewrite EQ; simpl. |
---|
1020 | replace (2 * x - 1) with (Z_shift_add true (x - 1)). |
---|
1021 | intro. elim (Z_shift_add_inj _ _ _ _ H); intros. |
---|
1022 | congruence. unfold Z_shift_add. omega. |
---|
1023 | Qed. |
---|
1024 | |
---|
1025 | Lemma bits_of_Z_mone: |
---|
1026 | forall n x, |
---|
1027 | 0 <= x < Z_of_nat n -> |
---|
1028 | bits_of_Z n (two_power_nat n - 1) x = true. |
---|
1029 | Proof. |
---|
1030 | induction n; intros. |
---|
1031 | simpl in H. omegaContradiction. |
---|
1032 | unfold bits_of_Z; fold bits_of_Z. |
---|
1033 | rewrite two_power_nat_S. rewrite Z_bin_decomp_2xm1. |
---|
1034 | rewrite inj_S in H. case (zeq x 0); intro. auto. |
---|
1035 | apply IHn. omega. |
---|
1036 | Qed. |
---|
1037 | |
---|
1038 | Lemma Z_bin_decomp_shift_add: |
---|
1039 | forall b x, Z_bin_decomp (Z_shift_add b x) = (b, x). |
---|
1040 | Proof. |
---|
1041 | intros. caseEq (Z_bin_decomp (Z_shift_add b x)); intros b' x' EQ. |
---|
1042 | generalize (Z_shift_add_bin_decomp (Z_shift_add b x)). |
---|
1043 | rewrite EQ; simpl fst; simpl snd. intro. |
---|
1044 | elim (Z_shift_add_inj _ _ _ _ H); intros. |
---|
1045 | congruence. |
---|
1046 | Qed. |
---|
1047 | |
---|
1048 | Lemma bits_of_Z_of_bits: |
---|
1049 | forall n f i, |
---|
1050 | 0 <= i < Z_of_nat n -> |
---|
1051 | bits_of_Z n (Z_of_bits n f) i = f i. |
---|
1052 | Proof. |
---|
1053 | induction n; intros; simpl. |
---|
1054 | simpl in H. omegaContradiction. |
---|
1055 | rewrite Z_bin_decomp_shift_add. |
---|
1056 | case (zeq i 0); intro. |
---|
1057 | congruence. |
---|
1058 | rewrite IHn. decEq. omega. rewrite inj_S in H. omega. |
---|
1059 | Qed. |
---|
1060 | |
---|
1061 | Lemma Z_of_bits_range: |
---|
1062 | forall f, 0 <= Z_of_bits wordsize f < modulus. |
---|
1063 | Proof. |
---|
1064 | unfold max_unsigned, modulus. |
---|
1065 | generalize wordsize. induction n; simpl; intros. |
---|
1066 | rewrite two_power_nat_O. omega. |
---|
1067 | rewrite two_power_nat_S. generalize (IHn (fun i => f (i + 1))). |
---|
1068 | set (x := Z_of_bits n (fun i => f (i + 1))). |
---|
1069 | intro. destruct (f 0); unfold Z_shift_add; omega. |
---|
1070 | Qed. |
---|
1071 | Hint Resolve Z_of_bits_range: ints. |
---|
1072 | |
---|
1073 | Lemma Z_of_bits_range_2: |
---|
1074 | forall f, 0 <= Z_of_bits wordsize f <= max_unsigned. |
---|
1075 | Proof. |
---|
1076 | intros. unfold max_unsigned. |
---|
1077 | generalize (Z_of_bits_range f). omega. |
---|
1078 | Qed. |
---|
1079 | Hint Resolve Z_of_bits_range_2: ints. |
---|
1080 | |
---|
1081 | Lemma bits_of_Z_below: |
---|
1082 | forall n x i, i < 0 -> bits_of_Z n x i = false. |
---|
1083 | Proof. |
---|
1084 | induction n; simpl; intros. |
---|
1085 | reflexivity. |
---|
1086 | destruct (Z_bin_decomp x). rewrite zeq_false. apply IHn. |
---|
1087 | omega. omega. |
---|
1088 | Qed. |
---|
1089 | |
---|
1090 | Lemma bits_of_Z_above: |
---|
1091 | forall n x i, i >= Z_of_nat n -> bits_of_Z n x i = false. |
---|
1092 | Proof. |
---|
1093 | induction n; intros; simpl. |
---|
1094 | reflexivity. |
---|
1095 | destruct (Z_bin_decomp x). rewrite zeq_false. apply IHn. |
---|
1096 | rewrite inj_S in H. omega. rewrite inj_S in H. omega. |
---|
1097 | Qed. |
---|
1098 | |
---|
1099 | Lemma bits_of_Z_of_bits': |
---|
1100 | forall n f i, |
---|
1101 | bits_of_Z n (Z_of_bits n f) i = |
---|
1102 | if zlt i 0 then false |
---|
1103 | else if zle (Z_of_nat n) i then false |
---|
1104 | else f i. |
---|
1105 | Proof. |
---|
1106 | intros. |
---|
1107 | destruct (zlt i 0). apply bits_of_Z_below; auto. |
---|
1108 | destruct (zle (Z_of_nat n) i). apply bits_of_Z_above. omega. |
---|
1109 | apply bits_of_Z_of_bits. omega. |
---|
1110 | Qed. |
---|
1111 | |
---|
1112 | Opaque Zmult. |
---|
1113 | |
---|
1114 | Lemma Z_of_bits_excl: |
---|
1115 | forall n f g h, |
---|
1116 | (forall i, 0 <= i < Z_of_nat n -> f i && g i = false) -> |
---|
1117 | (forall i, 0 <= i < Z_of_nat n -> f i || g i = h i) -> |
---|
1118 | Z_of_bits n f + Z_of_bits n g = Z_of_bits n h. |
---|
1119 | Proof. |
---|
1120 | induction n. |
---|
1121 | intros; reflexivity. |
---|
1122 | intros. simpl. rewrite inj_S in H. rewrite inj_S in H0. |
---|
1123 | rewrite <- (IHn (fun i => f(i+1)) (fun i => g(i+1)) (fun i => h(i+1))). |
---|
1124 | assert (0 <= 0 < Zsucc(Z_of_nat n)). omega. |
---|
1125 | unfold Z_shift_add. |
---|
1126 | rewrite <- H0; auto. |
---|
1127 | set (F := Z_of_bits n (fun i => f(i + 1))). |
---|
1128 | set (G := Z_of_bits n (fun i => g(i + 1))). |
---|
1129 | caseEq (f 0); intros; caseEq (g 0); intros; simpl. |
---|
1130 | generalize (H 0 H1). rewrite H2; rewrite H3. simpl. intros; discriminate. |
---|
1131 | omega. omega. omega. |
---|
1132 | intros; apply H. omega. |
---|
1133 | intros; apply H0. omega. |
---|
1134 | Qed. |
---|
1135 | |
---|
1136 | (** ** Properties of bitwise and, or, xor *) |
---|
1137 | |
---|
1138 | Lemma bitwise_binop_commut: |
---|
1139 | forall f, |
---|
1140 | (forall a b, f a b = f b a) -> |
---|
1141 | forall x y, |
---|
1142 | bitwise_binop f x y = bitwise_binop f y x. |
---|
1143 | Proof. |
---|
1144 | unfold bitwise_binop; intros. |
---|
1145 | decEq. apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. auto. |
---|
1146 | Qed. |
---|
1147 | |
---|
1148 | Lemma bitwise_binop_assoc: |
---|
1149 | forall f, |
---|
1150 | (forall a b c, f a (f b c) = f (f a b) c) -> |
---|
1151 | forall x y z, |
---|
1152 | bitwise_binop f (bitwise_binop f x y) z = |
---|
1153 | bitwise_binop f x (bitwise_binop f y z). |
---|
1154 | Proof. |
---|
1155 | unfold bitwise_binop; intros. |
---|
1156 | repeat rewrite unsigned_repr; auto with ints. |
---|
1157 | decEq. apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. |
---|
1158 | repeat (rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits; auto). |
---|
1159 | Qed. |
---|
1160 | |
---|
1161 | Lemma bitwise_binop_idem: |
---|
1162 | forall f, |
---|
1163 | (forall a, f a a = a) -> |
---|
1164 | forall x, |
---|
1165 | bitwise_binop f x x = x. |
---|
1166 | Proof. |
---|
1167 | unfold bitwise_binop; intros. |
---|
1168 | transitivity (repr (Z_of_bits wordsize (bits_of_Z wordsize (unsigned x)))). |
---|
1169 | decEq. apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. auto. |
---|
1170 | transitivity (repr (unsigned x)). |
---|
1171 | apply eqm_samerepr. apply Z_of_bits_of_Z. apply repr_unsigned. |
---|
1172 | Qed. |
---|
1173 | |
---|
1174 | Theorem and_commut: forall x y, and x y = and y x. |
---|
1175 | Proof (bitwise_binop_commut andb andb_comm). |
---|
1176 | |
---|
1177 | Theorem and_assoc: forall x y z, and (and x y) z = and x (and y z). |
---|
1178 | Proof (bitwise_binop_assoc andb andb_assoc). |
---|
1179 | |
---|
1180 | Theorem and_zero: forall x, and x zero = zero. |
---|
1181 | Proof. |
---|
1182 | intros. unfold and, bitwise_binop. |
---|
1183 | apply eqm_samerepr. eapply eqm_trans. 2: apply Z_of_bits_of_Z. |
---|
1184 | apply eqm_refl2. apply Z_of_bits_exten. intros. |
---|
1185 | rewrite unsigned_zero. rewrite bits_of_Z_zero. apply andb_b_false. |
---|
1186 | Qed. |
---|
1187 | |
---|
1188 | Theorem and_mone: forall x, and x mone = x. |
---|
1189 | Proof. |
---|
1190 | intros. unfold and, bitwise_binop. |
---|
1191 | transitivity (repr(unsigned x)). |
---|
1192 | apply eqm_samerepr. eapply eqm_trans. 2: apply Z_of_bits_of_Z. |
---|
1193 | apply eqm_refl2. apply Z_of_bits_exten. intros. |
---|
1194 | rewrite unsigned_mone. rewrite bits_of_Z_mone. apply andb_b_true. auto. |
---|
1195 | apply repr_unsigned. |
---|
1196 | Qed. |
---|
1197 | |
---|
1198 | Theorem and_idem: forall x, and x x = x. |
---|
1199 | Proof. |
---|
1200 | assert (forall b, b && b = b). |
---|
1201 | destruct b; reflexivity. |
---|
1202 | exact (bitwise_binop_idem andb H). |
---|
1203 | Qed. |
---|
1204 | |
---|
1205 | Theorem or_commut: forall x y, or x y = or y x. |
---|
1206 | Proof (bitwise_binop_commut orb orb_comm). |
---|
1207 | |
---|
1208 | Theorem or_assoc: forall x y z, or (or x y) z = or x (or y z). |
---|
1209 | Proof (bitwise_binop_assoc orb orb_assoc). |
---|
1210 | |
---|
1211 | Theorem or_zero: forall x, or x zero = x. |
---|
1212 | Proof. |
---|
1213 | intros. unfold or, bitwise_binop. |
---|
1214 | transitivity (repr(unsigned x)). |
---|
1215 | apply eqm_samerepr. eapply eqm_trans. 2: apply Z_of_bits_of_Z. |
---|
1216 | apply eqm_refl2. apply Z_of_bits_exten. intros. |
---|
1217 | rewrite unsigned_zero. rewrite bits_of_Z_zero. apply orb_b_false. |
---|
1218 | apply repr_unsigned. |
---|
1219 | Qed. |
---|
1220 | |
---|
1221 | Theorem or_mone: forall x, or x mone = mone. |
---|
1222 | Proof. |
---|
1223 | intros. unfold or, bitwise_binop. |
---|
1224 | transitivity (repr(unsigned mone)). |
---|
1225 | apply eqm_samerepr. eapply eqm_trans. 2: apply Z_of_bits_of_Z. |
---|
1226 | apply eqm_refl2. apply Z_of_bits_exten. intros. |
---|
1227 | rewrite unsigned_mone. rewrite bits_of_Z_mone. apply orb_b_true. auto. |
---|
1228 | apply repr_unsigned. |
---|
1229 | Qed. |
---|
1230 | |
---|
1231 | Theorem or_idem: forall x, or x x = x. |
---|
1232 | Proof. |
---|
1233 | assert (forall b, b || b = b). |
---|
1234 | destruct b; reflexivity. |
---|
1235 | exact (bitwise_binop_idem orb H). |
---|
1236 | Qed. |
---|
1237 | |
---|
1238 | Theorem and_or_distrib: |
---|
1239 | forall x y z, |
---|
1240 | and x (or y z) = or (and x y) (and x z). |
---|
1241 | Proof. |
---|
1242 | intros; unfold and, or, bitwise_binop. |
---|
1243 | decEq. repeat rewrite unsigned_repr; auto with ints. |
---|
1244 | apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. |
---|
1245 | repeat rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits; auto. |
---|
1246 | apply demorgan1. |
---|
1247 | Qed. |
---|
1248 | |
---|
1249 | Theorem xor_commut: forall x y, xor x y = xor y x. |
---|
1250 | Proof (bitwise_binop_commut xorb xorb_comm). |
---|
1251 | |
---|
1252 | Theorem xor_assoc: forall x y z, xor (xor x y) z = xor x (xor y z). |
---|
1253 | Proof. |
---|
1254 | assert (forall a b c, xorb a (xorb b c) = xorb (xorb a b) c). |
---|
1255 | symmetry. apply xorb_assoc. |
---|
1256 | exact (bitwise_binop_assoc xorb H). |
---|
1257 | Qed. |
---|
1258 | |
---|
1259 | Theorem xor_zero: forall x, xor x zero = x. |
---|
1260 | Proof. |
---|
1261 | intros. unfold xor, bitwise_binop. |
---|
1262 | transitivity (repr(unsigned x)). |
---|
1263 | apply eqm_samerepr. eapply eqm_trans. 2: apply Z_of_bits_of_Z. |
---|
1264 | apply eqm_refl2. apply Z_of_bits_exten. intros. |
---|
1265 | rewrite unsigned_zero. rewrite bits_of_Z_zero. apply xorb_false. |
---|
1266 | apply repr_unsigned. |
---|
1267 | Qed. |
---|
1268 | |
---|
1269 | Theorem xor_idem: forall x, xor x x = zero. |
---|
1270 | Proof. |
---|
1271 | intros. unfold xor, bitwise_binop. |
---|
1272 | transitivity (repr(unsigned zero)). |
---|
1273 | apply eqm_samerepr. eapply eqm_trans. 2: apply Z_of_bits_of_Z. |
---|
1274 | apply eqm_refl2. apply Z_of_bits_exten. intros. |
---|
1275 | rewrite unsigned_zero. rewrite bits_of_Z_zero. apply xorb_nilpotent. |
---|
1276 | apply repr_unsigned. |
---|
1277 | Qed. |
---|
1278 | |
---|
1279 | Theorem xor_zero_one: xor zero one = one. |
---|
1280 | Proof. rewrite xor_commut. apply xor_zero. Qed. |
---|
1281 | |
---|
1282 | Theorem xor_one_one: xor one one = zero. |
---|
1283 | Proof. apply xor_idem. Qed. |
---|
1284 | |
---|
1285 | Theorem and_xor_distrib: |
---|
1286 | forall x y z, |
---|
1287 | and x (xor y z) = xor (and x y) (and x z). |
---|
1288 | Proof. |
---|
1289 | intros; unfold and, xor, bitwise_binop. |
---|
1290 | decEq. repeat rewrite unsigned_repr; auto with ints. |
---|
1291 | apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. |
---|
1292 | repeat rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits; auto. |
---|
1293 | assert (forall a b c, a && (xorb b c) = xorb (a && b) (a && c)). |
---|
1294 | destruct a; destruct b; destruct c; reflexivity. |
---|
1295 | auto. |
---|
1296 | Qed. |
---|
1297 | |
---|
1298 | Theorem not_involutive: |
---|
1299 | forall (x: int), not (not x) = x. |
---|
1300 | Proof. |
---|
1301 | intros. unfold not. rewrite xor_assoc. rewrite xor_idem. apply xor_zero. |
---|
1302 | Qed. |
---|
1303 | |
---|
1304 | (** ** Properties of shifts and rotates *) |
---|
1305 | |
---|
1306 | Lemma Z_of_bits_shift: |
---|
1307 | forall n f, |
---|
1308 | exists k, |
---|
1309 | Z_of_bits n (fun i => f (i - 1)) = |
---|
1310 | k * two_power_nat n + Z_shift_add (f (-1)) (Z_of_bits n f). |
---|
1311 | Proof. |
---|
1312 | induction n; intros. |
---|
1313 | simpl. rewrite two_power_nat_O. unfold Z_shift_add. |
---|
1314 | exists (if f (-1) then (-1) else 0). |
---|
1315 | destruct (f (-1)); omega. |
---|
1316 | rewrite two_power_nat_S. simpl. |
---|
1317 | elim (IHn (fun i => f (i + 1))). intros k' EQ. |
---|
1318 | replace (Z_of_bits n (fun i => f (i - 1 + 1))) |
---|
1319 | with (Z_of_bits n (fun i => f (i + 1 - 1))) in EQ. |
---|
1320 | rewrite EQ. |
---|
1321 | change (-1 + 1) with 0. |
---|
1322 | exists k'. |
---|
1323 | unfold Z_shift_add; destruct (f (-1)); destruct (f 0); ring. |
---|
1324 | apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. |
---|
1325 | decEq. omega. |
---|
1326 | Qed. |
---|
1327 | |
---|
1328 | Lemma Z_of_bits_shifts: |
---|
1329 | forall m f, |
---|
1330 | 0 <= m -> |
---|
1331 | (forall i, i < 0 -> f i = false) -> |
---|
1332 | eqm (Z_of_bits wordsize (fun i => f (i - m))) |
---|
1333 | (two_p m * Z_of_bits wordsize f). |
---|
1334 | Proof. |
---|
1335 | intros. pattern m. apply natlike_ind. |
---|
1336 | apply eqm_refl2. transitivity (Z_of_bits wordsize f). |
---|
1337 | apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. decEq. omega. |
---|
1338 | simpl two_p. omega. |
---|
1339 | intros. rewrite two_p_S; auto. |
---|
1340 | set (f' := fun i => f (i - x)). |
---|
1341 | apply eqm_trans with (Z_of_bits wordsize (fun i => f' (i - 1))). |
---|
1342 | apply eqm_refl2. apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. |
---|
1343 | unfold f'. decEq. omega. |
---|
1344 | apply eqm_trans with (Z_shift_add (f' (-1)) (Z_of_bits wordsize f')). |
---|
1345 | exact (Z_of_bits_shift wordsize f'). |
---|
1346 | unfold f'. unfold Z_shift_add. rewrite H0. |
---|
1347 | rewrite <- Zmult_assoc. apply eqm_mult. apply eqm_refl. |
---|
1348 | apply H2. omega. assumption. |
---|
1349 | Qed. |
---|
1350 | |
---|
1351 | Lemma shl_mul_two_p: |
---|
1352 | forall x y, |
---|
1353 | shl x y = mul x (repr (two_p (unsigned y))). |
---|
1354 | Proof. |
---|
1355 | intros. unfold shl, mul. |
---|
1356 | apply eqm_samerepr. |
---|
1357 | eapply eqm_trans. |
---|
1358 | apply Z_of_bits_shifts. |
---|
1359 | generalize (unsigned_range y). omega. |
---|
1360 | intros; apply bits_of_Z_below; auto. |
---|
1361 | rewrite Zmult_comm. apply eqm_mult. |
---|
1362 | apply Z_of_bits_of_Z. apply eqm_unsigned_repr. |
---|
1363 | Qed. |
---|
1364 | |
---|
1365 | Theorem shl_zero: forall x, shl x zero = x. |
---|
1366 | Proof. |
---|
1367 | intros. rewrite shl_mul_two_p. |
---|
1368 | change (repr (two_p (unsigned zero))) with one. |
---|
1369 | apply mul_one. |
---|
1370 | Qed. |
---|
1371 | |
---|
1372 | Theorem shl_mul: |
---|
1373 | forall x y, |
---|
1374 | shl x y = mul x (shl one y). |
---|
1375 | Proof. |
---|
1376 | intros. |
---|
1377 | assert (shl one y = repr (two_p (unsigned y))). |
---|
1378 | rewrite shl_mul_two_p. rewrite mul_commut. rewrite mul_one. auto. |
---|
1379 | rewrite H. apply shl_mul_two_p. |
---|
1380 | Qed. |
---|
1381 | |
---|
1382 | Lemma ltu_inv: |
---|
1383 | forall x y, ltu x y = true -> 0 <= unsigned x < unsigned y. |
---|
1384 | Proof. |
---|
1385 | unfold ltu; intros. destruct (zlt (unsigned x) (unsigned y)). |
---|
1386 | split; auto. generalize (unsigned_range x); omega. |
---|
1387 | discriminate. |
---|
1388 | Qed. |
---|
1389 | |
---|
1390 | Theorem shl_rolm: |
---|
1391 | forall x n, |
---|
1392 | ltu n iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1393 | shl x n = rolm x n (shl mone n). |
---|
1394 | Proof. |
---|
1395 | intros. exploit ltu_inv; eauto. rewrite unsigned_repr_wordsize; intros. |
---|
1396 | unfold shl, rolm, rol, and, bitwise_binop. |
---|
1397 | decEq. apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. |
---|
1398 | repeat rewrite unsigned_repr; auto with ints. |
---|
1399 | repeat rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits; auto. |
---|
1400 | case (zlt z (unsigned n)); intro LT2. |
---|
1401 | assert (z - unsigned n < 0). omega. |
---|
1402 | rewrite (bits_of_Z_below wordsize (unsigned x) _ H2). |
---|
1403 | rewrite (bits_of_Z_below wordsize (unsigned mone) _ H2). |
---|
1404 | symmetry. apply andb_b_false. |
---|
1405 | assert (z - unsigned n < Z_of_nat wordsize). |
---|
1406 | generalize (unsigned_range n). omega. |
---|
1407 | rewrite unsigned_mone. |
---|
1408 | rewrite bits_of_Z_mone. rewrite andb_b_true. decEq. |
---|
1409 | rewrite Zmod_small. auto. omega. omega. |
---|
1410 | Qed. |
---|
1411 | |
---|
1412 | Lemma bitwise_binop_shl: |
---|
1413 | forall f x y n, |
---|
1414 | f false false = false -> |
---|
1415 | bitwise_binop f (shl x n) (shl y n) = shl (bitwise_binop f x y) n. |
---|
1416 | Proof. |
---|
1417 | intros. unfold bitwise_binop, shl. |
---|
1418 | decEq. repeat rewrite unsigned_repr; auto with ints. |
---|
1419 | apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. |
---|
1420 | case (zlt (z - unsigned n) 0); intro. |
---|
1421 | transitivity false. repeat rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits; auto. |
---|
1422 | repeat rewrite bits_of_Z_below; auto. |
---|
1423 | rewrite bits_of_Z_below; auto. |
---|
1424 | repeat rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits; auto. |
---|
1425 | generalize (unsigned_range n). omega. |
---|
1426 | Qed. |
---|
1427 | |
---|
1428 | Theorem and_shl: |
---|
1429 | forall x y n, |
---|
1430 | and (shl x n) (shl y n) = shl (and x y) n. |
---|
1431 | Proof. |
---|
1432 | unfold and; intros. apply bitwise_binop_shl. reflexivity. |
---|
1433 | Qed. |
---|
1434 | |
---|
1435 | |
---|
1436 | Theorem shl_shl: |
---|
1437 | forall x y z, |
---|
1438 | ltu y iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1439 | ltu z iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1440 | ltu (add y z) iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1441 | shl (shl x y) z = shl x (add y z). |
---|
1442 | Proof. |
---|
1443 | intros. unfold shl, add. |
---|
1444 | generalize (ltu_inv _ _ H). |
---|
1445 | generalize (ltu_inv _ _ H0). |
---|
1446 | rewrite unsigned_repr_wordsize. |
---|
1447 | set (x' := unsigned x). |
---|
1448 | set (y' := unsigned y). |
---|
1449 | set (z' := unsigned z). |
---|
1450 | intros. |
---|
1451 | repeat rewrite unsigned_repr. |
---|
1452 | decEq. apply Z_of_bits_exten. intros n R. |
---|
1453 | rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits'. |
---|
1454 | destruct (zlt (n - z') 0). |
---|
1455 | symmetry. apply bits_of_Z_below. omega. |
---|
1456 | destruct (zle (Z_of_nat wordsize) (n - z')). |
---|
1457 | symmetry. apply bits_of_Z_below. omega. |
---|
1458 | decEq. omega. |
---|
1459 | generalize two_wordsize_max_unsigned; omega. |
---|
1460 | apply Z_of_bits_range_2. |
---|
1461 | Qed. |
---|
1462 | |
---|
1463 | Theorem shru_shru: |
---|
1464 | forall x y z, |
---|
1465 | ltu y iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1466 | ltu z iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1467 | ltu (add y z) iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1468 | shru (shru x y) z = shru x (add y z). |
---|
1469 | Proof. |
---|
1470 | intros. unfold shru, add. |
---|
1471 | generalize (ltu_inv _ _ H). |
---|
1472 | generalize (ltu_inv _ _ H0). |
---|
1473 | rewrite unsigned_repr_wordsize. |
---|
1474 | set (x' := unsigned x). |
---|
1475 | set (y' := unsigned y). |
---|
1476 | set (z' := unsigned z). |
---|
1477 | intros. |
---|
1478 | repeat rewrite unsigned_repr. |
---|
1479 | decEq. apply Z_of_bits_exten. intros n R. |
---|
1480 | rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits'. |
---|
1481 | destruct (zlt (n + z') 0). omegaContradiction. |
---|
1482 | destruct (zle (Z_of_nat wordsize) (n + z')). |
---|
1483 | symmetry. apply bits_of_Z_above. omega. |
---|
1484 | decEq. omega. |
---|
1485 | generalize two_wordsize_max_unsigned; omega. |
---|
1486 | apply Z_of_bits_range_2. |
---|
1487 | Qed. |
---|
1488 | |
---|
1489 | Theorem shru_rolm: |
---|
1490 | forall x n, |
---|
1491 | ltu n iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1492 | shru x n = rolm x (sub iwordsize n) (shru mone n). |
---|
1493 | Proof. |
---|
1494 | intros. generalize (ltu_inv _ _ H). rewrite unsigned_repr_wordsize. intro. |
---|
1495 | unfold shru, rolm, rol, and, bitwise_binop. |
---|
1496 | decEq. apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. |
---|
1497 | repeat rewrite unsigned_repr; auto with ints. |
---|
1498 | repeat rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits; auto. |
---|
1499 | unfold sub. rewrite unsigned_repr_wordsize. |
---|
1500 | rewrite unsigned_repr. |
---|
1501 | case (zlt (z + unsigned n) (Z_of_nat wordsize)); intro LT2. |
---|
1502 | rewrite unsigned_mone. rewrite bits_of_Z_mone. rewrite andb_b_true. |
---|
1503 | decEq. |
---|
1504 | replace (z - (Z_of_nat wordsize - unsigned n)) |
---|
1505 | with ((z + unsigned n) + (-1) * Z_of_nat wordsize). |
---|
1506 | rewrite Z_mod_plus. symmetry. apply Zmod_small. |
---|
1507 | generalize (unsigned_range n). omega. omega. omega. |
---|
1508 | generalize (unsigned_range n). omega. |
---|
1509 | rewrite (bits_of_Z_above wordsize (unsigned x) _ LT2). |
---|
1510 | rewrite (bits_of_Z_above wordsize (unsigned mone) _ LT2). |
---|
1511 | symmetry. apply andb_b_false. |
---|
1512 | split. omega. apply Zle_trans with (Z_of_nat wordsize). |
---|
1513 | generalize (unsigned_range n); omega. apply wordsize_max_unsigned. |
---|
1514 | Qed. |
---|
1515 | |
---|
1516 | Lemma bitwise_binop_shru: |
---|
1517 | forall f x y n, |
---|
1518 | f false false = false -> |
---|
1519 | bitwise_binop f (shru x n) (shru y n) = shru (bitwise_binop f x y) n. |
---|
1520 | Proof. |
---|
1521 | intros. unfold bitwise_binop, shru. |
---|
1522 | decEq. repeat rewrite unsigned_repr; auto with ints. |
---|
1523 | apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. |
---|
1524 | case (zlt (z + unsigned n) (Z_of_nat wordsize)); intro. |
---|
1525 | repeat rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits; auto. |
---|
1526 | generalize (unsigned_range n); omega. |
---|
1527 | transitivity false. repeat rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits; auto. |
---|
1528 | repeat rewrite bits_of_Z_above; auto. |
---|
1529 | rewrite bits_of_Z_above; auto. |
---|
1530 | Qed. |
---|
1531 | |
---|
1532 | Lemma and_shru: |
---|
1533 | forall x y n, |
---|
1534 | and (shru x n) (shru y n) = shru (and x y) n. |
---|
1535 | Proof. |
---|
1536 | unfold and; intros. apply bitwise_binop_shru. reflexivity. |
---|
1537 | Qed. |
---|
1538 | |
---|
1539 | Theorem shr_shr: |
---|
1540 | forall x y z, |
---|
1541 | ltu y iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1542 | ltu z iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1543 | ltu (add y z) iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1544 | shr (shr x y) z = shr x (add y z). |
---|
1545 | Proof. |
---|
1546 | intros. unfold shr, add. |
---|
1547 | generalize (ltu_inv _ _ H). |
---|
1548 | generalize (ltu_inv _ _ H0). |
---|
1549 | rewrite unsigned_repr_wordsize. |
---|
1550 | set (x' := signed x). |
---|
1551 | set (y' := unsigned y). |
---|
1552 | set (z' := unsigned z). |
---|
1553 | intros. |
---|
1554 | rewrite unsigned_repr. |
---|
1555 | rewrite two_p_is_exp. |
---|
1556 | rewrite signed_repr. |
---|
1557 | decEq. apply Zdiv_Zdiv. apply two_p_gt_ZERO. omega. apply two_p_gt_ZERO. omega. |
---|
1558 | apply Zdiv_interval_2. unfold x'; apply signed_range. |
---|
1559 | generalize min_signed_neg; omega. |
---|
1560 | generalize max_signed_pos; omega. |
---|
1561 | apply two_p_gt_ZERO. omega. omega. omega. |
---|
1562 | generalize two_wordsize_max_unsigned; omega. |
---|
1563 | Qed. |
---|
1564 | |
---|
1565 | Theorem rol_zero: |
---|
1566 | forall x, |
---|
1567 | rol x zero = x. |
---|
1568 | Proof. |
---|
1569 | intros. transitivity (repr (unsigned x)). |
---|
1570 | unfold rol. apply eqm_samerepr. eapply eqm_trans. 2: apply Z_of_bits_of_Z. |
---|
1571 | apply eqm_refl2. apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. decEq. rewrite unsigned_zero. |
---|
1572 | replace (z - 0) with z by omega. apply Zmod_small. auto. |
---|
1573 | apply repr_unsigned. |
---|
1574 | Qed. |
---|
1575 | |
---|
1576 | Lemma bitwise_binop_rol: |
---|
1577 | forall f x y n, |
---|
1578 | bitwise_binop f (rol x n) (rol y n) = rol (bitwise_binop f x y) n. |
---|
1579 | Proof. |
---|
1580 | intros. unfold bitwise_binop, rol. |
---|
1581 | decEq. repeat (rewrite unsigned_repr; auto with ints). |
---|
1582 | apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. |
---|
1583 | repeat rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits; auto. |
---|
1584 | apply Z_mod_lt. generalize wordsize_pos; omega. |
---|
1585 | Qed. |
---|
1586 | |
---|
1587 | Theorem rol_and: |
---|
1588 | forall x y n, |
---|
1589 | rol (and x y) n = and (rol x n) (rol y n). |
---|
1590 | Proof. |
---|
1591 | intros. symmetry. unfold and. apply bitwise_binop_rol. |
---|
1592 | Qed. |
---|
1593 | |
---|
1594 | Theorem rol_rol: |
---|
1595 | forall x n m, |
---|
1596 | Zdivide (Z_of_nat wordsize) modulus -> |
---|
1597 | rol (rol x n) m = rol x (modu (add n m) iwordsize). |
---|
1598 | Proof. |
---|
1599 | intros. unfold rol. decEq. |
---|
1600 | repeat (rewrite unsigned_repr; auto with ints). |
---|
1601 | apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. |
---|
1602 | repeat rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits; auto. |
---|
1603 | decEq. unfold modu, add. |
---|
1604 | set (W := Z_of_nat wordsize). |
---|
1605 | set (M := unsigned m); set (N := unsigned n). |
---|
1606 | assert (W > 0). unfold W; generalize wordsize_pos; omega. |
---|
1607 | assert (forall a, eqmod W a (unsigned (repr a))). |
---|
1608 | intros. eapply eqmod_divides. apply eqm_unsigned_repr. assumption. |
---|
1609 | apply eqmod_mod_eq. auto. |
---|
1610 | replace (unsigned iwordsize) with W. |
---|
1611 | apply eqmod_trans with (z - (N + M) mod W). |
---|
1612 | apply eqmod_trans with ((z - M) - N). |
---|
1613 | apply eqmod_sub. apply eqmod_sym. apply eqmod_mod. auto. |
---|
1614 | apply eqmod_refl. |
---|
1615 | replace (z - M - N) with (z - (N + M)). |
---|
1616 | apply eqmod_sub. apply eqmod_refl. apply eqmod_mod. auto. |
---|
1617 | omega. |
---|
1618 | apply eqmod_sub. apply eqmod_refl. |
---|
1619 | eapply eqmod_trans; [idtac|apply H2]. |
---|
1620 | eapply eqmod_trans; [idtac|apply eqmod_mod]. |
---|
1621 | apply eqmod_sym. eapply eqmod_trans; [idtac|apply eqmod_mod]. |
---|
1622 | apply eqmod_sym. apply H2. auto. auto. |
---|
1623 | symmetry. unfold W. apply unsigned_repr_wordsize. |
---|
1624 | apply Z_mod_lt. generalize wordsize_pos; omega. |
---|
1625 | Qed. |
---|
1626 | |
---|
1627 | Theorem rolm_zero: |
---|
1628 | forall x m, |
---|
1629 | rolm x zero m = and x m. |
---|
1630 | Proof. |
---|
1631 | intros. unfold rolm. rewrite rol_zero. auto. |
---|
1632 | Qed. |
---|
1633 | |
---|
1634 | Theorem rolm_rolm: |
---|
1635 | forall x n1 m1 n2 m2, |
---|
1636 | Zdivide (Z_of_nat wordsize) modulus -> |
---|
1637 | rolm (rolm x n1 m1) n2 m2 = |
---|
1638 | rolm x (modu (add n1 n2) iwordsize) |
---|
1639 | (and (rol m1 n2) m2). |
---|
1640 | Proof. |
---|
1641 | intros. |
---|
1642 | unfold rolm. rewrite rol_and. rewrite and_assoc. |
---|
1643 | rewrite rol_rol. reflexivity. auto. |
---|
1644 | Qed. |
---|
1645 | |
---|
1646 | Theorem rol_or: |
---|
1647 | forall x y n, |
---|
1648 | rol (or x y) n = or (rol x n) (rol y n). |
---|
1649 | Proof. |
---|
1650 | intros. symmetry. unfold or. apply bitwise_binop_rol. |
---|
1651 | Qed. |
---|
1652 | |
---|
1653 | Theorem or_rolm: |
---|
1654 | forall x n m1 m2, |
---|
1655 | or (rolm x n m1) (rolm x n m2) = rolm x n (or m1 m2). |
---|
1656 | Proof. |
---|
1657 | intros; unfold rolm. symmetry. apply and_or_distrib. |
---|
1658 | Qed. |
---|
1659 | |
---|
1660 | Theorem ror_rol: |
---|
1661 | forall x y, |
---|
1662 | ltu y iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1663 | ror x y = rol x (sub iwordsize y). |
---|
1664 | Proof. |
---|
1665 | intros. unfold ror, rol, sub. |
---|
1666 | generalize (ltu_inv _ _ H). |
---|
1667 | rewrite unsigned_repr_wordsize. |
---|
1668 | intro. rewrite unsigned_repr. |
---|
1669 | decEq. apply Z_of_bits_exten. intros. decEq. |
---|
1670 | apply eqmod_mod_eq. omega. |
---|
1671 | exists 1. omega. |
---|
1672 | generalize wordsize_pos; generalize wordsize_max_unsigned; omega. |
---|
1673 | Qed. |
---|
1674 | |
---|
1675 | Theorem or_ror: |
---|
1676 | forall x y z, |
---|
1677 | ltu y iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1678 | ltu z iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1679 | add y z = iwordsize -> |
---|
1680 | ror x z = or (shl x y) (shru x z). |
---|
1681 | Proof. |
---|
1682 | intros. |
---|
1683 | generalize (ltu_inv _ _ H). |
---|
1684 | generalize (ltu_inv _ _ H0). |
---|
1685 | rewrite unsigned_repr_wordsize. |
---|
1686 | intros. |
---|
1687 | unfold or, bitwise_binop, shl, shru, ror. |
---|
1688 | set (ux := unsigned x). |
---|
1689 | decEq. apply Z_of_bits_exten. intros i iRANGE. |
---|
1690 | repeat rewrite unsigned_repr. |
---|
1691 | repeat rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits; auto. |
---|
1692 | assert (y = sub iwordsize z). |
---|
1693 | rewrite <- H1. rewrite add_commut. rewrite sub_add_l. rewrite sub_idem. |
---|
1694 | rewrite add_commut. rewrite add_zero. auto. |
---|
1695 | assert (unsigned y = Z_of_nat wordsize - unsigned z). |
---|
1696 | rewrite H4. unfold sub. rewrite unsigned_repr_wordsize. apply unsigned_repr. |
---|
1697 | generalize wordsize_max_unsigned; omega. |
---|
1698 | destruct (zlt (i + unsigned z) (Z_of_nat wordsize)). |
---|
1699 | rewrite Zmod_small. |
---|
1700 | replace (bits_of_Z wordsize ux (i - unsigned y)) with false. |
---|
1701 | auto. |
---|
1702 | symmetry. apply bits_of_Z_below. omega. omega. |
---|
1703 | replace (bits_of_Z wordsize ux (i + unsigned z)) with false. |
---|
1704 | rewrite orb_false_r. decEq. |
---|
1705 | replace (i + unsigned z) with (i - unsigned y + 1 * Z_of_nat wordsize) by omega. |
---|
1706 | rewrite Z_mod_plus. apply Zmod_small. omega. generalize wordsize_pos; omega. |
---|
1707 | symmetry. apply bits_of_Z_above. auto. |
---|
1708 | apply Z_of_bits_range_2. apply Z_of_bits_range_2. |
---|
1709 | Qed. |
---|
1710 | |
---|
1711 | Lemma bits_of_Z_two_p: |
---|
1712 | forall n x i, |
---|
1713 | x >= 0 -> 0 <= i < Z_of_nat n -> |
---|
1714 | bits_of_Z n (two_p x - 1) i = zlt i x. |
---|
1715 | Proof. |
---|
1716 | induction n; intros. |
---|
1717 | simpl in H0. omegaContradiction. |
---|
1718 | destruct (zeq x 0). subst x. change (two_p 0 - 1) with 0. rewrite bits_of_Z_zero. |
---|
1719 | unfold proj_sumbool; rewrite zlt_false. auto. omega. |
---|
1720 | replace (two_p x) with (2 * two_p (x - 1)). simpl. rewrite Z_bin_decomp_2xm1. |
---|
1721 | destruct (zeq i 0). subst. unfold proj_sumbool. rewrite zlt_true. auto. omega. |
---|
1722 | rewrite inj_S in H0. rewrite IHn. unfold proj_sumbool. destruct (zlt i x). |
---|
1723 | apply zlt_true. omega. |
---|
1724 | apply zlt_false. omega. |
---|
1725 | omega. omega. rewrite <- two_p_S. decEq. omega. omega. |
---|
1726 | Qed. |
---|
1727 | |
---|
1728 | Remark two_p_m1_range: |
---|
1729 | forall n, |
---|
1730 | 0 <= n <= Z_of_nat wordsize -> |
---|
1731 | 0 <= two_p n - 1 <= max_unsigned. |
---|
1732 | Proof. |
---|
1733 | intros. split. |
---|
1734 | assert (two_p n > 0). apply two_p_gt_ZERO. omega. omega. |
---|
1735 | assert (two_p n <= two_p (Z_of_nat wordsize)). apply two_p_monotone. auto. |
---|
1736 | unfold max_unsigned. unfold modulus. rewrite two_power_nat_two_p. omega. |
---|
1737 | Qed. |
---|
1738 | |
---|
1739 | Theorem shru_shl_and: |
---|
1740 | forall x y, |
---|
1741 | ltu y iwordsize = true -> |
---|
1742 | shru (shl x y) y = and x (repr (two_p (Z_of_nat wordsize - unsigned y) - 1)). |
---|
1743 | Proof. |
---|
1744 | intros. exploit ltu_inv; eauto. rewrite unsigned_repr_wordsize. intros. |
---|
1745 | unfold and, bitwise_binop, shl, shru. |
---|
1746 | decEq. apply Z_of_bits_exten. intros. |
---|
1747 | repeat rewrite unsigned_repr. |
---|
1748 | rewrite bits_of_Z_two_p. |
---|
1749 | destruct (zlt (z + unsigned y) (Z_of_nat wordsize)). |
---|
1750 | rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits. unfold proj_sumbool. rewrite zlt_true. |
---|
1751 | rewrite andb_true_r. f_equal. omega. |
---|
1752 | omega. omega. |
---|
1753 | rewrite bits_of_Z_above. unfold proj_sumbool. rewrite zlt_false. rewrite andb_false_r; auto. |
---|
1754 | omega. omega. omega. auto. |
---|
1755 | apply two_p_m1_range. omega. |
---|
1756 | apply Z_of_bits_range_2. |
---|
1757 | Qed. |
---|
1758 | |
---|
1759 | (** ** Relation between shifts and powers of 2 *) |
---|
1760 | |
---|
1761 | Fixpoint powerserie (l: list Z): Z := |
---|
1762 | match l with |
---|
1763 | | nil => 0 |
---|
1764 | | x :: xs => two_p x + powerserie xs |
---|
1765 | end. |
---|
1766 | |
---|
1767 | Lemma Z_bin_decomp_range: |
---|
1768 | forall x n, |
---|
1769 | 0 <= x < 2 * n -> 0 <= snd (Z_bin_decomp x) < n. |
---|
1770 | Proof. |
---|
1771 | intros. rewrite <- (Z_shift_add_bin_decomp x) in H. |
---|
1772 | unfold Z_shift_add in H. destruct (fst (Z_bin_decomp x)); omega. |
---|
1773 | Qed. |
---|
1774 | |
---|
1775 | Lemma Z_one_bits_powerserie: |
---|
1776 | forall x, 0 <= x < modulus -> x = powerserie (Z_one_bits wordsize x 0). |
---|
1777 | Proof. |
---|
1778 | assert (forall n x i, |
---|
1779 | 0 <= i -> |
---|
1780 | 0 <= x < two_power_nat n -> |
---|
1781 | x * two_p i = powerserie (Z_one_bits n x i)). |
---|
1782 | induction n; intros. |
---|
1783 | simpl. rewrite two_power_nat_O in H0. |
---|
1784 | assert (x = 0). omega. subst x. omega. |
---|
1785 | rewrite two_power_nat_S in H0. simpl Z_one_bits. |
---|
1786 | generalize (Z_shift_add_bin_decomp x). |
---|
1787 | generalize (Z_bin_decomp_range x _ H0). |
---|
1788 | case (Z_bin_decomp x). simpl. intros b y RANGE SHADD. |
---|
1789 | subst x. unfold Z_shift_add. |
---|
1790 | destruct b. simpl powerserie. rewrite <- IHn. |
---|
1791 | rewrite two_p_is_exp. change (two_p 1) with 2. ring. |
---|
1792 | auto. omega. omega. auto. |
---|
1793 | rewrite <- IHn. |
---|
1794 | rewrite two_p_is_exp. change (two_p 1) with 2. ring. |
---|
1795 | auto. omega. omega. auto. |
---|
1796 | intros. rewrite <- H. change (two_p 0) with 1. omega. |
---|
1797 | omega. exact H0. |
---|
1798 | Qed. |
---|
1799 | |
---|
1800 | Lemma Z_one_bits_range: |
---|
1801 | forall x i, In i (Z_one_bits wordsize x 0) -> 0 <= i < Z_of_nat wordsize. |
---|
1802 | Proof. |
---|
1803 | assert (forall n x i j, |
---|
1804 | In j (Z_one_bits n x i) -> i <= j < i + Z_of_nat n). |
---|
1805 | induction n; simpl In. |
---|
1806 | intros; elim H. |
---|
1807 | intros x i j. destruct (Z_bin_decomp x). case b. |
---|
1808 | rewrite inj_S. simpl. intros [A|B]. subst j. omega. |
---|
1809 | generalize (IHn _ _ _ B). omega. |
---|
1810 | intros B. rewrite inj_S. generalize (IHn _ _ _ B). omega. |
---|
1811 | intros. generalize (H wordsize x 0 i H0). omega. |
---|
1812 | Qed. |
---|
1813 | |
---|
1814 | Lemma is_power2_rng: |
---|
1815 | forall n logn, |
---|
1816 | is_power2 n = Some logn -> |
---|
1817 | 0 <= unsigned logn < Z_of_nat wordsize. |
---|
1818 | Proof. |
---|
1819 | intros n logn. unfold is_power2. |
---|
1820 | generalize (Z_one_bits_range (unsigned n)). |
---|
1821 | destruct (Z_one_bits wordsize (unsigned n) 0). |
---|
1822 | intros; discriminate. |
---|
1823 | destruct l. |
---|
1824 | intros. injection H0; intro; subst logn; clear H0. |
---|
1825 | assert (0 <= z < Z_of_nat wordsize). |
---|
1826 | apply H. auto with coqlib. |
---|
1827 | rewrite unsigned_repr. auto. generalize wordsize_max_unsigned; omega. |
---|
1828 | intros; discriminate. |
---|
1829 | Qed. |
---|
1830 | |
---|
1831 | Theorem is_power2_range: |
---|
1832 | forall n logn, |
---|
1833 | is_power2 n = Some logn -> ltu logn iwordsize = true. |
---|
1834 | Proof. |
---|
1835 | intros. unfold ltu. rewrite unsigned_repr_wordsize. |
---|
1836 | generalize (is_power2_rng _ _ H). |
---|
1837 | case (zlt (unsigned logn) (Z_of_nat wordsize)); intros. |
---|
1838 | auto. omegaContradiction. |
---|
1839 | Qed. |
---|
1840 | |
---|
1841 | Lemma is_power2_correct: |
---|
1842 | forall n logn, |
---|
1843 | is_power2 n = Some logn -> |
---|
1844 | unsigned n = two_p (unsigned logn). |
---|
1845 | Proof. |
---|
1846 | intros n logn. unfold is_power2. |
---|
1847 | generalize (Z_one_bits_powerserie (unsigned n) (unsigned_range n)). |
---|
1848 | generalize (Z_one_bits_range (unsigned n)). |
---|
1849 | destruct (Z_one_bits wordsize (unsigned n) 0). |
---|
1850 | intros; discriminate. |
---|
1851 | destruct l. |
---|
1852 | intros. simpl in H0. injection H1; intros; subst logn; clear H1. |
---|
1853 | rewrite unsigned_repr. replace (two_p z) with (two_p z + 0). |
---|
1854 | auto. omega. elim (H z); intros. |
---|
1855 | generalize wordsize_max_unsigned; omega. |
---|
1856 | auto with coqlib. |
---|
1857 | intros; discriminate. |
---|
1858 | Qed. |
---|
1859 | |
---|
1860 | Remark two_p_range: |
---|
1861 | forall n, |
---|
1862 | 0 <= n < Z_of_nat wordsize -> |
---|
1863 | 0 <= two_p n <= max_unsigned. |
---|
1864 | Proof. |
---|
1865 | intros. split. |
---|
1866 | assert (two_p n > 0). apply two_p_gt_ZERO. omega. omega. |
---|
1867 | generalize (two_p_monotone_strict _ _ H). rewrite <- two_power_nat_two_p. |
---|
1868 | unfold max_unsigned, modulus. omega. |
---|
1869 | Qed. |
---|
1870 | |
---|
1871 | Remark Z_one_bits_zero: |
---|
1872 | forall n i, Z_one_bits n 0 i = nil. |
---|
1873 | Proof. |
---|
1874 | induction n; intros; simpl; auto. |
---|
1875 | Qed. |
---|
1876 | |
---|
1877 | Remark Z_one_bits_two_p: |
---|
1878 | forall n x i, |
---|
1879 | 0 <= x < Z_of_nat n -> |
---|
1880 | Z_one_bits n (two_p x) i = (i + x) :: nil. |
---|
1881 | Proof. |
---|
1882 | induction n; intros; simpl. simpl in H. omegaContradiction. |
---|
1883 | rewrite inj_S in H. |
---|
1884 | assert (x = 0 \/ 0 < x) by omega. destruct H0. |
---|
1885 | subst x; simpl. decEq. omega. apply Z_one_bits_zero. |
---|
1886 | replace (two_p x) with (Z_shift_add false (two_p (x-1))). |
---|
1887 | rewrite Z_bin_decomp_shift_add. |
---|
1888 | replace (i + x) with ((i + 1) + (x - 1)) by omega. |
---|
1889 | apply IHn. omega. |
---|
1890 | unfold Z_shift_add. rewrite <- two_p_S. decEq; omega. omega. |
---|
1891 | Qed. |
---|
1892 | |
---|
1893 | Lemma is_power2_two_p: |
---|
1894 | forall n, 0 <= n < Z_of_nat wordsize -> |
---|
1895 | is_power2 (repr (two_p n)) = Some (repr n). |
---|
1896 | Proof. |
---|
1897 | intros. unfold is_power2. rewrite unsigned_repr. |
---|
1898 | rewrite Z_one_bits_two_p. auto. auto. |
---|
1899 | apply two_p_range. auto. |
---|
1900 | Qed. |
---|
1901 | |
---|
1902 | Theorem mul_pow2: |
---|
1903 | forall x n logn, |
---|
1904 | is_power2 n = Some logn -> |
---|
1905 | mul x n = shl x logn. |
---|
1906 | Proof. |
---|
1907 | intros. generalize (is_power2_correct n logn H); intro. |
---|
1908 | rewrite shl_mul_two_p. rewrite <- H0. rewrite repr_unsigned. |
---|
1909 | auto. |
---|
1910 | Qed. |
---|
1911 | |
---|
1912 | Lemma Z_of_bits_shift_rev: |
---|
1913 | forall n f, |
---|
1914 | (forall i, i >= Z_of_nat n -> f i = false) -> |
---|
1915 | Z_of_bits n f = Z_shift_add (f 0) (Z_of_bits n (fun i => f(i + 1))). |
---|
1916 | Proof. |
---|
1917 | induction n; intros. |
---|
1918 | simpl. rewrite H. reflexivity. unfold Z_of_nat. omega. |
---|
1919 | simpl. rewrite (IHn (fun i => f (i + 1))). |
---|
1920 | reflexivity. |
---|
1921 | intros. apply H. rewrite inj_S. omega. |
---|
1922 | Qed. |
---|
1923 | |
---|
1924 | Lemma Z_of_bits_shifts_rev: |
---|
1925 | forall m f, |
---|
1926 | 0 <= m -> |
---|
1927 | (forall i, i >= Z_of_nat wordsize -> f i = false) -> |
---|
1928 | exists k, |
---|
1929 | Z_of_bits wordsize f = k + two_p m * Z_of_bits wordsize (fun i => f(i + m)) |
---|
1930 | /\ 0 <= k < two_p m. |
---|
1931 | Proof. |
---|
1932 | intros. pattern m. apply natlike_ind. |
---|
1933 | exists 0. change (two_p 0) with 1. split. |
---|
1934 | transitivity (Z_of_bits wordsize (fun i => f (i + 0))). |
---|
1935 | apply Z_of_bits_exten. intros. decEq. omega. |
---|
1936 | omega. omega. |
---|
1937 | intros x POSx [k [EQ1 RANGE1]]. |
---|
1938 | set (f' := fun i => f (i + x)) in *. |
---|
1939 | assert (forall i, i >= Z_of_nat wordsize -> f' i = false). |
---|
1940 | intros. unfold f'. apply H0. omega. |
---|
1941 | generalize (Z_of_bits_shift_rev wordsize f' H1). intro. |
---|
1942 | rewrite EQ1. rewrite H2. |
---|
1943 | set (z := Z_of_bits wordsize (fun i => f (i + Zsucc x))). |
---|
1944 | replace (Z_of_bits wordsize (fun i => f' (i + 1))) with z. |
---|
1945 | rewrite two_p_S. |
---|
1946 | case (f' 0); unfold Z_shift_add. |
---|
1947 | exists (k + two_p x). split. ring. omega. |
---|
1948 | exists k. split. ring. omega. |
---|
1949 | auto. |
---|
1950 | unfold z. apply Z_of_bits_exten; intros. unfold f'. |
---|
1951 | decEq. omega. |
---|
1952 | auto. |
---|
1953 | Qed. |
---|
1954 | |
---|
1955 | Lemma shru_div_two_p: |
---|
1956 | forall x y, |
---|
1957 | shru x y = repr (unsigned x / two_p (unsigned y)). |
---|
1958 | Proof. |
---|
1959 | intros. unfold shru. |
---|
1960 | set (x' := unsigned x). set (y' := unsigned y). |
---|
1961 | elim (Z_of_bits_shifts_rev y' (bits_of_Z wordsize x')). |
---|
1962 | intros k [EQ RANGE]. |
---|
1963 | replace (Z_of_bits wordsize (bits_of_Z wordsize x')) with x' in EQ. |
---|
1964 | rewrite Zplus_comm in EQ. rewrite Zmult_comm in EQ. |
---|
1965 | generalize (Zdiv_unique _ _ _ _ EQ RANGE). intros. |
---|
1966 | rewrite H. auto. |
---|
1967 | apply eqm_small_eq. apply eqm_sym. apply Z_of_bits_of_Z. |
---|
1968 | unfold x'. apply unsigned_range. |
---|
1969 | auto with ints. |
---|
1970 | generalize (unsigned_range y). unfold y'. omega. |
---|
1971 | intros. apply bits_of_Z_above. auto. |
---|
1972 | Qed. |
---|
1973 | |
---|
1974 | Theorem shru_zero: |
---|
1975 | forall x, shru x zero = x. |
---|
1976 | Proof. |
---|
1977 | intros. rewrite shru_div_two_p. change (two_p (unsigned zero)) with 1. |
---|
1978 | transitivity (repr (unsigned x)). decEq. apply Zdiv_unique with 0. |
---|
1979 | omega. omega. auto with ints. |
---|
1980 | Qed. |
---|
1981 | |
---|
1982 | Theorem shr_zero: |
---|
1983 | forall x, shr x zero = x. |
---|
1984 | Proof. |
---|
1985 | intros. unfold shr. change (two_p (unsigned zero)) with 1. |
---|
1986 | replace (signed x / 1) with (signed x). |
---|
1987 | apply repr_signed. |
---|
1988 | symmetry. apply Zdiv_unique with 0. omega. omega. |
---|
1989 | Qed. |
---|
1990 | |
---|
1991 | Theorem divu_pow2: |
---|
1992 | forall x n logn, |
---|
1993 | is_power2 n = Some logn -> |
---|
1994 | divu x n = shru x logn. |
---|
1995 | Proof. |
---|
1996 | intros. generalize (is_power2_correct n logn H). intro. |
---|
1997 | symmetry. unfold divu. rewrite H0. apply shru_div_two_p. |
---|
1998 | Qed. |
---|
1999 | |
---|
2000 | Lemma modu_divu_Euclid: |
---|
2001 | forall x y, y <> zero -> x = add (mul (divu x y) y) (modu x y). |
---|
2002 | Proof. |
---|
2003 | intros. unfold add, mul, divu, modu. |
---|
2004 | transitivity (repr (unsigned x)). auto with ints. |
---|
2005 | apply eqm_samerepr. |
---|
2006 | set (x' := unsigned x). set (y' := unsigned y). |
---|
2007 | apply eqm_trans with ((x' / y') * y' + x' mod y'). |
---|
2008 | apply eqm_refl2. rewrite Zmult_comm. apply Z_div_mod_eq. |
---|
2009 | generalize (unsigned_range y); intro. |
---|
2010 | assert (unsigned y <> 0). red; intro. |
---|
2011 | elim H. rewrite <- (repr_unsigned y). unfold zero. congruence. |
---|
2012 | unfold y'. omega. |
---|
2013 | auto with ints. |
---|
2014 | Qed. |
---|
2015 | |
---|
2016 | Theorem modu_divu: |
---|
2017 | forall x y, y <> zero -> modu x y = sub x (mul (divu x y) y). |
---|
2018 | Proof. |
---|
2019 | intros. |
---|
2020 | assert (forall a b c, a = add b c -> c = sub a b). |
---|
2021 | intros. subst a. rewrite sub_add_l. rewrite sub_idem. |
---|
2022 | rewrite add_commut. rewrite add_zero. auto. |
---|
2023 | apply H0. apply modu_divu_Euclid. auto. |
---|
2024 | Qed. |
---|
2025 | |
---|
2026 | Theorem mods_divs: |
---|
2027 | forall x y, mods x y = sub x (mul (divs x y) y). |
---|
2028 | Proof. |
---|
2029 | intros; unfold mods, sub, mul, divs. |
---|
2030 | apply eqm_samerepr. |
---|
2031 | unfold Zmod_round. |
---|
2032 | apply eqm_sub. apply eqm_signed_unsigned. |
---|
2033 | apply eqm_unsigned_repr_r. |
---|
2034 | apply eqm_mult. auto with ints. apply eqm_signed_unsigned. |
---|
2035 | Qed. |
---|
2036 | |
---|
2037 | Theorem divs_pow2: |
---|
2038 | forall x n logn, |
---|
2039 | is_power2 n = Some logn -> |
---|
2040 | divs x n = shrx x logn. |
---|
2041 | Proof. |
---|
2042 | intros. generalize (is_power2_correct _ _ H); intro. |
---|
2043 | unfold shrx. rewrite shl_mul_two_p. |
---|
2044 | rewrite mul_commut. rewrite mul_one. |
---|
2045 | rewrite <- H0. rewrite repr_unsigned. auto. |
---|
2046 | Qed. |
---|
2047 | |
---|
2048 | Theorem shrx_carry: |
---|
2049 | forall x y, |
---|
2050 | add (shr x y) (shr_carry x y) = shrx x y. |
---|
2051 | Proof. |
---|
2052 | intros. unfold shr_carry. |
---|
2053 | rewrite sub_add_opp. rewrite add_permut. |
---|
2054 | rewrite add_neg_zero. apply add_zero. |
---|
2055 | Qed. |
---|
2056 | |
---|
2057 | Lemma Zdiv_round_Zdiv: |
---|
2058 | forall x y, |
---|
2059 | y > 0 -> |
---|
2060 | Zdiv_round x y = if zlt x 0 then (x + y - 1) / y else x / y. |
---|
2061 | Proof. |
---|
2062 | intros. unfold Zdiv_round. |
---|
2063 | destruct (zlt x 0). |
---|
2064 | rewrite zlt_false; try omega. |
---|
2065 | generalize (Z_div_mod_eq (-x) y H). |
---|
2066 | generalize (Z_mod_lt (-x) y H). |
---|
2067 | set (q := (-x) / y). set (r := (-x) mod y). intros. |
---|
2068 | symmetry. |
---|
2069 | apply Zdiv_unique with (y - r - 1). |
---|
2070 | replace x with (- (y * q) - r) by omega. |
---|
2071 | replace (-(y * q)) with ((-q) * y) by ring. |
---|
2072 | omega. |
---|
2073 | omega. |
---|
2074 | apply zlt_false. omega. |
---|
2075 | Qed. |
---|
2076 | |
---|
2077 | Theorem shrx_shr: |
---|
2078 | forall x y, |
---|
2079 | ltu y (repr (Z_of_nat wordsize - 1)) = true -> |
---|
2080 | shrx x y = |
---|
2081 | shr (if lt x zero then add x (sub (shl one y) one) else x) y. |
---|
2082 | Proof. |
---|
2083 | intros. unfold shrx, divs, shr. decEq. |
---|
2084 | exploit ltu_inv; eauto. rewrite unsigned_repr. |
---|
2085 | set (uy := unsigned y). |
---|
2086 | intro RANGE. |
---|
2087 | assert (shl one y = repr (two_p uy)). |
---|
2088 | transitivity (mul one (repr (two_p uy))). |
---|
2089 | symmetry. apply mul_pow2. replace y with (repr uy). |
---|
2090 | apply is_power2_two_p. omega. unfold uy. apply repr_unsigned. |
---|
2091 | rewrite mul_commut. apply mul_one. |
---|
2092 | assert (two_p uy > 0). apply two_p_gt_ZERO. omega. |
---|
2093 | assert (two_p uy < half_modulus). |
---|
2094 | rewrite half_modulus_power. |
---|
2095 | apply two_p_monotone_strict. auto. |
---|
2096 | assert (two_p uy < modulus). |
---|
2097 | rewrite modulus_power. apply two_p_monotone_strict. omega. |
---|
2098 | assert (unsigned (shl one y) = two_p uy). |
---|
2099 | rewrite H0. apply unsigned_repr. unfold max_unsigned. omega. |
---|
2100 | assert (signed (shl one y) = two_p uy). |
---|
2101 | rewrite H0. apply signed_repr. |
---|
2102 | unfold max_signed. generalize min_signed_neg. omega. |
---|
2103 | rewrite H5. |
---|
2104 | rewrite Zdiv_round_Zdiv; auto. |
---|
2105 | unfold lt. rewrite signed_zero. |
---|
2106 | destruct (zlt (signed x) 0); auto. |
---|
2107 | rewrite add_signed. |
---|
2108 | assert (signed (sub (shl one y) one) = two_p uy - 1). |
---|
2109 | unfold sub. rewrite H4. rewrite unsigned_one. |
---|
2110 | apply signed_repr. |
---|
2111 | generalize min_signed_neg. unfold max_signed. omega. |
---|
2112 | rewrite H6. rewrite signed_repr. decEq. omega. |
---|
2113 | generalize (signed_range x). intros. |
---|
2114 | assert (two_p uy - 1 <= max_signed). unfold max_signed. omega. |
---|
2115 | omega. |
---|
2116 | generalize wordsize_pos wordsize_max_unsigned; omega. |
---|
2117 | Qed. |
---|
2118 | |
---|
2119 | Lemma add_and: |
---|
2120 | forall x y z, |
---|
2121 | and y z = zero -> |
---|
2122 | add (and x y) (and x z) = and x (or y z). |
---|
2123 | Proof. |
---|
2124 | intros. unfold add, and, bitwise_binop. |
---|
2125 | decEq. |
---|
2126 | repeat rewrite unsigned_repr; auto with ints. |
---|
2127 | apply Z_of_bits_excl; intros. |
---|
2128 | assert (forall a b c, a && b && (a && c) = a && (b && c)). |
---|
2129 | destruct a; destruct b; destruct c; reflexivity. |
---|
2130 | rewrite H1. |
---|
2131 | replace (bits_of_Z wordsize (unsigned y) i && |
---|
2132 | bits_of_Z wordsize (unsigned z) i) |
---|
2133 | with (bits_of_Z wordsize (unsigned (and y z)) i). |
---|
2134 | rewrite H. change (unsigned zero) with 0. |
---|
2135 | rewrite bits_of_Z_zero. apply andb_b_false. |
---|
2136 | unfold and, bitwise_binop. |
---|
2137 | rewrite unsigned_repr; auto with ints. rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits. |
---|
2138 | reflexivity. auto. |
---|
2139 | rewrite <- demorgan1. |
---|
2140 | unfold or, bitwise_binop. |
---|
2141 | rewrite unsigned_repr; auto with ints. rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits; auto. |
---|
2142 | Qed. |
---|
2143 | |
---|
2144 | Lemma Z_of_bits_zero: |
---|
2145 | forall n f, |
---|
2146 | (forall i, i >= 0 -> f i = false) -> |
---|
2147 | Z_of_bits n f = 0. |
---|
2148 | Proof. |
---|
2149 | induction n; intros; simpl. |
---|
2150 | auto. |
---|
2151 | rewrite H. rewrite IHn. auto. intros. apply H. omega. omega. |
---|
2152 | Qed. |
---|
2153 | |
---|
2154 | Lemma Z_of_bits_trunc_1: |
---|
2155 | forall n f k, |
---|
2156 | (forall i, i >= k -> f i = false) -> |
---|
2157 | k >= 0 -> |
---|
2158 | 0 <= Z_of_bits n f < two_p k. |
---|
2159 | Proof. |
---|
2160 | induction n; intros. |
---|
2161 | simpl. assert (two_p k > 0). apply two_p_gt_ZERO; omega. omega. |
---|
2162 | destruct (zeq k 0). subst k. |
---|
2163 | change (two_p 0) with 1. rewrite Z_of_bits_zero. omega. auto. |
---|
2164 | simpl. replace (two_p k) with (2 * two_p (k - 1)). |
---|
2165 | assert (0 <= Z_of_bits n (fun i => f(i+1)) < two_p (k - 1)). |
---|
2166 | apply IHn. intros. apply H. omega. omega. |
---|
2167 | unfold Z_shift_add. destruct (f 0); omega. |
---|
2168 | rewrite <- two_p_S. decEq. omega. omega. |
---|
2169 | Qed. |
---|
2170 | |
---|
2171 | Lemma Z_of_bits_trunc_2: |
---|
2172 | forall n f1 f2 k, |
---|
2173 | (forall i, i < k -> f2 i = f1 i) -> |
---|
2174 | k >= 0 -> |
---|
2175 | exists q, Z_of_bits n f1 = q * two_p k + Z_of_bits n f2. |
---|
2176 | Proof. |
---|
2177 | induction n; intros. |
---|
2178 | simpl. exists 0; omega. |
---|
2179 | destruct (zeq k 0). subst k. |
---|
2180 | exists (Z_of_bits (S n) f1 - Z_of_bits (S n) f2). |
---|
2181 | change (two_p 0) with 1. omega. |
---|
2182 | destruct (IHn (fun i => f1 (i + 1)) (fun i => f2 (i + 1)) (k - 1)) as [q EQ]. |
---|
2183 | intros. apply H. omega. omega. |
---|
2184 | exists q. simpl. rewrite H. unfold Z_shift_add. |
---|
2185 | replace (two_p k) with (2 * two_p (k - 1)). rewrite EQ. |
---|
2186 | destruct (f1 0). ring. ring. |
---|
2187 | rewrite <- two_p_S. decEq. omega. omega. omega. |
---|
2188 | Qed. |
---|
2189 | |
---|
2190 | Lemma Z_of_bits_trunc_3: |
---|
2191 | forall f n k, |
---|
2192 | k >= 0 -> |
---|
2193 | Zmod (Z_of_bits n f) (two_p k) = Z_of_bits n (fun i => if zlt i k then f i else false). |
---|
2194 | Proof. |
---|
2195 | intros. |
---|
2196 | set (g := fun i : Z => if zlt i k then f i else false). |
---|
2197 | destruct (Z_of_bits_trunc_2 n f g k). |
---|
2198 | intros. unfold g. apply zlt_true. auto. |
---|
2199 | auto. |
---|
2200 | apply Zmod_unique with x. auto. |
---|
2201 | apply Z_of_bits_trunc_1. intros. unfold g. apply zlt_false. auto. auto. |
---|
2202 | Qed. |
---|
2203 | |
---|
2204 | Theorem modu_and: |
---|
2205 | forall x n logn, |
---|
2206 | is_power2 n = Some logn -> |
---|
2207 | modu x n = and x (sub n one). |
---|
2208 | Proof. |
---|
2209 | intros. generalize (is_power2_correct _ _ H); intro. |
---|
2210 | generalize (is_power2_rng _ _ H); intro. |
---|
2211 | unfold modu, and, bitwise_binop. |
---|
2212 | decEq. |
---|
2213 | set (ux := unsigned x). |
---|
2214 | replace ux with (Z_of_bits wordsize (bits_of_Z wordsize ux)). |
---|
2215 | rewrite H0. rewrite Z_of_bits_trunc_3. apply Z_of_bits_exten. intros. |
---|
2216 | rewrite bits_of_Z_of_bits; auto. |
---|
2217 | replace (unsigned (sub n one)) with (two_p (unsigned logn) - 1). |
---|
2218 | rewrite bits_of_Z_two_p. unfold proj_sumbool. |
---|
2219 | destruct (zlt z (unsigned logn)). rewrite andb_true_r; auto. rewrite andb_false_r; auto. |
---|
2220 | omega. auto. |
---|
2221 | rewrite <- H0. unfold sub. symmetry. rewrite unsigned_one. apply unsigned_repr. |
---|
2222 | rewrite H0. |
---|
2223 | assert (two_p (unsigned logn) > 0). apply two_p_gt_ZERO. omega. |
---|
2224 | generalize (two_p_range _ H1). omega. |
---|
2225 | omega. |
---|
2226 | apply eqm_small_eq. apply Z_of_bits_of_Z. apply Z_of_bits_range. |
---|
2227 | unfold ux. apply unsigned_range. |
---|
2228 | Qed. |
---|
2229 | |
---|
2230 | (** ** Properties of integer zero extension and sign extension. *) |
---|
2231 | |
---|
2232 | Section EXTENSIONS. |
---|
2233 | |
---|
2234 | Variable n: Z. |
---|
2235 | Hypothesis RANGE: 0 < n < Z_of_nat wordsize. |
---|
2236 | |
---|
2237 | Remark two_p_n_pos: |
---|
2238 | two_p n > 0. |
---|
2239 | Proof. apply two_p_gt_ZERO. omega. Qed. |
---|
2240 | |
---|
2241 | Remark two_p_n_range: |
---|
2242 | 0 <= two_p n <= max_unsigned. |
---|
2243 | Proof. apply two_p_range. omega. Qed. |
---|
2244 | |
---|
2245 | Remark two_p_n_range': |
---|
2246 | two_p n <= max_signed + 1. |
---|
2247 | Proof. |
---|
2248 | unfold max_signed. rewrite half_modulus_power. |
---|
2249 | assert (two_p n <= two_p (Z_of_nat wordsize - 1)). |
---|
2250 | apply two_p_monotone. omega. |
---|
2251 | omega. |
---|
2252 | Qed. |
---|
2253 | |
---|
2254 | Remark unsigned_repr_two_p: |
---|
2255 | unsigned (repr (two_p n)) = two_p n. |
---|
2256 | Proof. |
---|
2257 | apply unsigned_repr. apply two_p_n_range. |
---|
2258 | Qed. |
---|
2259 | |
---|
2260 | Theorem zero_ext_and: |
---|
2261 | forall x, zero_ext n x = and x (repr (two_p n - 1)). |
---|
2262 | Proof. |
---|
2263 | intros; unfold zero_ext. |
---|
2264 | assert (is_power2 (repr (two_p n)) = Some (repr n)). |
---|
2265 | apply is_power2_two_p. omega. |
---|
2266 | generalize (modu_and x _ _ H). |
---|
2267 | unfold modu. rewrite unsigned_repr_two_p. intro. rewrite H0. |
---|
2268 | decEq. unfold sub. decEq. rewrite unsigned_repr_two_p. |
---|
2269 | rewrite unsigned_one. reflexivity. |
---|
2270 | Qed. |
---|
2271 | |
---|
2272 | Theorem zero_ext_idem: |
---|
2273 | forall x, zero_ext n (zero_ext n x) = zero_ext n x. |
---|
2274 | Proof. |
---|
2275 | intros. repeat rewrite zero_ext_and. |
---|
2276 | rewrite and_assoc. rewrite and_idem. auto. |
---|
2277 | Qed. |
---|
2278 | |
---|
2279 | Lemma eqm_eqmod_two_p: |
---|
2280 | forall a b, eqm a b -> eqmod (two_p n) a b. |
---|
2281 | Proof. |
---|
2282 | intros a b [k EQ]. |
---|
2283 | exists (k * two_p (Z_of_nat wordsize - n)). |
---|
2284 | rewrite EQ. decEq. rewrite <- Zmult_assoc. decEq. |
---|
2285 | rewrite <- two_p_is_exp. unfold modulus. rewrite two_power_nat_two_p. |
---|
2286 | decEq. omega. omega. omega. |
---|
2287 | Qed. |
---|
2288 | |
---|
2289 | Lemma sign_ext_charact: |
---|
2290 | forall x y, |
---|
2291 | -(two_p (n-1)) <= signed y < two_p (n-1) -> |
---|
2292 | eqmod (two_p n) (unsigned x) (signed y) -> |
---|
2293 | sign_ext n x = y. |
---|
2294 | Proof. |
---|
2295 | intros. unfold sign_ext. set (x' := unsigned x) in *. |
---|
2296 | destruct H0 as [k EQ]. |
---|
2297 | assert (two_p n = 2 * two_p (n - 1)). rewrite <- two_p_S. decEq. omega. omega. |
---|
2298 | assert (signed y >= 0 \/ signed y < 0) by omega. destruct H1. |
---|
2299 | assert (x' mod two_p n = signed y). |
---|
2300 | apply Zmod_unique with k; auto. omega. |
---|
2301 | rewrite zlt_true. rewrite H2. apply repr_signed. omega. |
---|
2302 | assert (x' mod two_p n = signed y + two_p n). |
---|
2303 | apply Zmod_unique with (k-1). rewrite EQ. ring. omega. |
---|
2304 | rewrite zlt_false. replace (x' mod two_p n - two_p n) with (signed y) by omega. apply repr_signed. |
---|
2305 | omega. |
---|
2306 | Qed. |
---|
2307 | |
---|
2308 | Lemma zero_ext_eqmod_two_p: |
---|
2309 | forall x y, |
---|
2310 | eqmod (two_p n) (unsigned x) (unsigned y) -> zero_ext n x = zero_ext n y. |
---|
2311 | Proof. |
---|
2312 | intros. unfold zero_ext. decEq. apply eqmod_mod_eq. apply two_p_n_pos. auto. |
---|
2313 | Qed. |
---|
2314 | |
---|
2315 | Lemma sign_ext_eqmod_two_p: |
---|
2316 | forall x y, |
---|
2317 | eqmod (two_p n) (unsigned x) (unsigned y) -> sign_ext n x = sign_ext n y. |
---|
2318 | Proof. |
---|
2319 | intros. unfold sign_ext. |
---|
2320 | assert (unsigned x mod two_p n = unsigned y mod two_p n). |
---|
2321 | apply eqmod_mod_eq. apply two_p_n_pos. auto. |
---|
2322 | rewrite H0. auto. |
---|
2323 | Qed. |
---|
2324 | |
---|
2325 | Lemma eqmod_two_p_zero_ext: |
---|
2326 | forall x, eqmod (two_p n) (unsigned x) (unsigned (zero_ext n x)). |
---|
2327 | Proof. |
---|
2328 | intros. unfold zero_ext. |
---|
2329 | apply eqmod_trans with (unsigned x mod two_p n). |
---|
2330 | apply eqmod_mod. apply two_p_n_pos. |
---|
2331 | apply eqm_eqmod_two_p. apply eqm_unsigned_repr. |
---|
2332 | Qed. |
---|
2333 | |
---|
2334 | Lemma eqmod_two_p_sign_ext: |
---|
2335 | forall x, eqmod (two_p n) (unsigned x) (unsigned (sign_ext n x)). |
---|
2336 | Proof. |
---|
2337 | intros. unfold sign_ext. destruct (zlt (unsigned x mod two_p n) (two_p (n-1))). |
---|
2338 | apply eqmod_trans with (unsigned x mod two_p n). |
---|
2339 | apply eqmod_mod. apply two_p_n_pos. |
---|
2340 | apply eqm_eqmod_two_p. apply eqm_unsigned_repr. |
---|
2341 | apply eqmod_trans with (unsigned x mod two_p n). |
---|
2342 | apply eqmod_mod. apply two_p_n_pos. |
---|
2343 | apply eqmod_trans with (unsigned x mod two_p n - 0). |
---|
2344 | apply eqmod_refl2. omega. |
---|
2345 | apply eqmod_trans with (unsigned x mod two_p n - two_p n). |
---|
2346 | apply eqmod_sub. apply eqmod_refl. exists (-1). ring. |
---|
2347 | apply eqm_eqmod_two_p. apply eqm_unsigned_repr. |
---|
2348 | Qed. |
---|
2349 | |
---|
2350 | Theorem sign_ext_idem: |
---|
2351 | forall x, sign_ext n (sign_ext n x) = sign_ext n x. |
---|
2352 | Proof. |
---|
2353 | intros. apply sign_ext_eqmod_two_p. |
---|
2354 | apply eqmod_sym. apply eqmod_two_p_sign_ext. |
---|
2355 | Qed. |
---|
2356 | *) |
---|
2357 | axiom sign_ext_zero_ext: |
---|
2358 | ∀n:Z.∀RANGE: 0 < n ∧ n < wordsize.∀x. sign_ext n (zero_ext n x) = sign_ext n x. |
---|
2359 | (* |
---|
2360 | Theorem sign_ext_zero_ext: |
---|
2361 | forall x, sign_ext n (zero_ext n x) = sign_ext n x. |
---|
2362 | Proof. |
---|
2363 | intros. apply sign_ext_eqmod_two_p. |
---|
2364 | apply eqmod_sym. apply eqmod_two_p_zero_ext. |
---|
2365 | Qed. |
---|
2366 | |
---|
2367 | Theorem zero_ext_sign_ext: |
---|
2368 | forall x, zero_ext n (sign_ext n x) = zero_ext n x. |
---|
2369 | Proof. |
---|
2370 | intros. apply zero_ext_eqmod_two_p. |
---|
2371 | apply eqmod_sym. apply eqmod_two_p_sign_ext. |
---|
2372 | Qed. |
---|
2373 | *) |
---|
2374 | axiom sign_ext_equal_if_zero_equal: |
---|
2375 | ∀n:Z.∀RANGE: 0 < n ∧ n < wordsize.∀x,y. |
---|
2376 | zero_ext n x = zero_ext n y -> |
---|
2377 | sign_ext n x = sign_ext n y. |
---|
2378 | (* |
---|
2379 | Theorem sign_ext_equal_if_zero_equal: |
---|
2380 | forall x y, |
---|
2381 | zero_ext n x = zero_ext n y -> |
---|
2382 | sign_ext n x = sign_ext n y. |
---|
2383 | Proof. |
---|
2384 | intros. rewrite <- (sign_ext_zero_ext x). |
---|
2385 | rewrite <- (sign_ext_zero_ext y). congruence. |
---|
2386 | Qed. |
---|
2387 | |
---|
2388 | Lemma eqmod_mult_div: |
---|
2389 | forall n1 n2 x y, |
---|
2390 | 0 <= n1 -> 0 <= n2 -> |
---|
2391 | eqmod (two_p (n1+n2)) (two_p n1 * x) y -> |
---|
2392 | eqmod (two_p n2) x (y / two_p n1). |
---|
2393 | Proof. |
---|
2394 | intros. rewrite two_p_is_exp in H1; auto. |
---|
2395 | destruct H1 as [k EQ]. exists k. |
---|
2396 | change x with (0 / two_p n1 + x). rewrite <- Z_div_plus. |
---|
2397 | replace (0 + x * two_p n1) with (two_p n1 * x) by ring. |
---|
2398 | rewrite EQ. |
---|
2399 | replace (k * (two_p n1 * two_p n2) + y) with (y + (k * two_p n2) * two_p n1) by ring. |
---|
2400 | rewrite Z_div_plus. ring. |
---|
2401 | apply two_p_gt_ZERO; auto. |
---|
2402 | apply two_p_gt_ZERO; auto. |
---|
2403 | Qed. |
---|
2404 | |
---|
2405 | Theorem sign_ext_shr_shl: |
---|
2406 | forall x, |
---|
2407 | let y := repr (Z_of_nat wordsize - n) in |
---|
2408 | sign_ext n x = shr (shl x y) y. |
---|
2409 | Proof. |
---|
2410 | intros. |
---|
2411 | assert (unsigned y = Z_of_nat wordsize - n). |
---|
2412 | unfold y. apply unsigned_repr. generalize wordsize_max_unsigned. omega. |
---|
2413 | apply sign_ext_charact. |
---|
2414 | (* inequalities *) |
---|
2415 | unfold shr. rewrite H. |
---|
2416 | set (z := signed (shl x y)). |
---|
2417 | rewrite signed_repr. |
---|
2418 | apply Zdiv_interval_1. |
---|
2419 | assert (two_p (n - 1) > 0). apply two_p_gt_ZERO. omega. omega. |
---|
2420 | apply two_p_gt_ZERO. omega. |
---|
2421 | apply two_p_gt_ZERO. omega. |
---|
2422 | replace ((- two_p (n-1)) * two_p (Z_of_nat wordsize - n)) |
---|
2423 | with (- (two_p (n-1) * two_p (Z_of_nat wordsize - n))) by ring. |
---|
2424 | rewrite <- two_p_is_exp. |
---|
2425 | replace (n - 1 + (Z_of_nat wordsize - n)) with (Z_of_nat wordsize - 1) by omega. |
---|
2426 | rewrite <- half_modulus_power. |
---|
2427 | generalize (signed_range (shl x y)). unfold z, min_signed, max_signed. omega. |
---|
2428 | omega. omega. |
---|
2429 | apply Zdiv_interval_2. unfold z. apply signed_range. |
---|
2430 | generalize min_signed_neg; omega. generalize max_signed_pos; omega. |
---|
2431 | apply two_p_gt_ZERO; omega. |
---|
2432 | (* eqmod *) |
---|
2433 | unfold shr. rewrite H. |
---|
2434 | apply eqmod_trans with (signed (shl x y) / two_p (Z_of_nat wordsize - n)). |
---|
2435 | apply eqmod_mult_div. omega. omega. |
---|
2436 | replace (Z_of_nat wordsize - n + n) with (Z_of_nat wordsize) by omega. |
---|
2437 | rewrite <- two_power_nat_two_p. |
---|
2438 | change (eqm (two_p (Z_of_nat wordsize - n) * unsigned x) (signed (shl x y))). |
---|
2439 | rewrite shl_mul_two_p. unfold mul. rewrite H. |
---|
2440 | apply eqm_sym. eapply eqm_trans. apply eqm_signed_unsigned. |
---|
2441 | apply eqm_unsigned_repr_l. rewrite (Zmult_comm (unsigned x)). |
---|
2442 | apply eqm_mult. apply eqm_sym. apply eqm_unsigned_repr. apply eqm_refl. |
---|
2443 | apply eqm_eqmod_two_p. apply eqm_sym. eapply eqm_trans. |
---|
2444 | apply eqm_signed_unsigned. apply eqm_sym. apply eqm_unsigned_repr. |
---|
2445 | Qed. |
---|
2446 | |
---|
2447 | Theorem zero_ext_shru_shl: |
---|
2448 | forall x, |
---|
2449 | let y := repr (Z_of_nat wordsize - n) in |
---|
2450 | zero_ext n x = shru (shl x y) y. |
---|
2451 | Proof. |
---|
2452 | intros. |
---|
2453 | assert (unsigned y = Z_of_nat wordsize - n). |
---|
2454 | unfold y. apply unsigned_repr. generalize wordsize_max_unsigned. omega. |
---|
2455 | rewrite zero_ext_and. symmetry. |
---|
2456 | replace n with (Z_of_nat wordsize - unsigned y). |
---|
2457 | apply shru_shl_and. unfold ltu. apply zlt_true. |
---|
2458 | rewrite H. rewrite unsigned_repr_wordsize. omega. omega. |
---|
2459 | Qed. |
---|
2460 | |
---|
2461 | End EXTENSIONS. |
---|
2462 | |
---|
2463 | (** ** Properties of [one_bits] (decomposition in sum of powers of two) *) |
---|
2464 | |
---|
2465 | Opaque Z_one_bits. (* Otherwise, next Qed blows up! *) |
---|
2466 | |
---|
2467 | Theorem one_bits_range: |
---|
2468 | forall x i, In i (one_bits x) -> ltu i iwordsize = true. |
---|
2469 | Proof. |
---|
2470 | intros. unfold one_bits in H. |
---|
2471 | elim (list_in_map_inv _ _ _ H). intros i0 [EQ IN]. |
---|
2472 | subst i. unfold ltu. unfold iwordsize. apply zlt_true. |
---|
2473 | generalize (Z_one_bits_range _ _ IN). intros. |
---|
2474 | assert (0 <= Z_of_nat wordsize <= max_unsigned). |
---|
2475 | generalize wordsize_pos wordsize_max_unsigned; omega. |
---|
2476 | repeat rewrite unsigned_repr; omega. |
---|
2477 | Qed. |
---|
2478 | |
---|
2479 | Fixpoint int_of_one_bits (l: list int) : int := |
---|
2480 | match l with |
---|
2481 | | nil => zero |
---|
2482 | | a :: b => add (shl one a) (int_of_one_bits b) |
---|
2483 | end. |
---|
2484 | |
---|
2485 | Theorem one_bits_decomp: |
---|
2486 | forall x, x = int_of_one_bits (one_bits x). |
---|
2487 | Proof. |
---|
2488 | intros. |
---|
2489 | transitivity (repr (powerserie (Z_one_bits wordsize (unsigned x) 0))). |
---|
2490 | transitivity (repr (unsigned x)). |
---|
2491 | auto with ints. decEq. apply Z_one_bits_powerserie. |
---|
2492 | auto with ints. |
---|
2493 | unfold one_bits. |
---|
2494 | generalize (Z_one_bits_range (unsigned x)). |
---|
2495 | generalize (Z_one_bits wordsize (unsigned x) 0). |
---|
2496 | induction l. |
---|
2497 | intros; reflexivity. |
---|
2498 | intros; simpl. rewrite <- IHl. unfold add. apply eqm_samerepr. |
---|
2499 | apply eqm_add. rewrite shl_mul_two_p. rewrite mul_commut. |
---|
2500 | rewrite mul_one. apply eqm_unsigned_repr_r. |
---|
2501 | rewrite unsigned_repr. auto with ints. |
---|
2502 | generalize (H a (in_eq _ _)). generalize wordsize_max_unsigned. omega. |
---|
2503 | auto with ints. |
---|
2504 | intros; apply H; auto with coqlib. |
---|
2505 | Qed. |
---|
2506 | |
---|
2507 | (** ** Properties of comparisons *) |
---|
2508 | |
---|
2509 | Theorem negate_cmp: |
---|
2510 | forall c x y, cmp (negate_comparison c) x y = negb (cmp c x y). |
---|
2511 | Proof. |
---|
2512 | intros. destruct c; simpl; try rewrite negb_elim; auto. |
---|
2513 | Qed. |
---|
2514 | |
---|
2515 | Theorem negate_cmpu: |
---|
2516 | forall c x y, cmpu (negate_comparison c) x y = negb (cmpu c x y). |
---|
2517 | Proof. |
---|
2518 | intros. destruct c; simpl; try rewrite negb_elim; auto. |
---|
2519 | Qed. |
---|
2520 | |
---|
2521 | Theorem swap_cmp: |
---|
2522 | forall c x y, cmp (swap_comparison c) x y = cmp c y x. |
---|
2523 | Proof. |
---|
2524 | intros. destruct c; simpl; auto. apply eq_sym. decEq. apply eq_sym. |
---|
2525 | Qed. |
---|
2526 | |
---|
2527 | Theorem swap_cmpu: |
---|
2528 | forall c x y, cmpu (swap_comparison c) x y = cmpu c y x. |
---|
2529 | Proof. |
---|
2530 | intros. destruct c; simpl; auto. apply eq_sym. decEq. apply eq_sym. |
---|
2531 | Qed. |
---|
2532 | |
---|
2533 | Lemma translate_eq: |
---|
2534 | forall x y d, |
---|
2535 | eq (add x d) (add y d) = eq x y. |
---|
2536 | Proof. |
---|
2537 | intros. unfold eq. case (zeq (unsigned x) (unsigned y)); intro. |
---|
2538 | unfold add. rewrite e. apply zeq_true. |
---|
2539 | apply zeq_false. unfold add. red; intro. apply n. |
---|
2540 | apply eqm_small_eq; auto with ints. |
---|
2541 | replace (unsigned x) with ((unsigned x + unsigned d) - unsigned d). |
---|
2542 | replace (unsigned y) with ((unsigned y + unsigned d) - unsigned d). |
---|
2543 | apply eqm_sub. apply eqm_trans with (unsigned (repr (unsigned x + unsigned d))). |
---|
2544 | eauto with ints. apply eqm_trans with (unsigned (repr (unsigned y + unsigned d))). |
---|
2545 | eauto with ints. eauto with ints. eauto with ints. |
---|
2546 | omega. omega. |
---|
2547 | Qed. |
---|
2548 | |
---|
2549 | Lemma translate_lt: |
---|
2550 | forall x y d, |
---|
2551 | min_signed <= signed x + signed d <= max_signed -> |
---|
2552 | min_signed <= signed y + signed d <= max_signed -> |
---|
2553 | lt (add x d) (add y d) = lt x y. |
---|
2554 | Proof. |
---|
2555 | intros. repeat rewrite add_signed. unfold lt. |
---|
2556 | repeat rewrite signed_repr; auto. case (zlt (signed x) (signed y)); intro. |
---|
2557 | apply zlt_true. omega. |
---|
2558 | apply zlt_false. omega. |
---|
2559 | Qed. |
---|
2560 | |
---|
2561 | Theorem translate_cmp: |
---|
2562 | forall c x y d, |
---|
2563 | min_signed <= signed x + signed d <= max_signed -> |
---|
2564 | min_signed <= signed y + signed d <= max_signed -> |
---|
2565 | cmp c (add x d) (add y d) = cmp c x y. |
---|
2566 | Proof. |
---|
2567 | intros. unfold cmp. |
---|
2568 | rewrite translate_eq. repeat rewrite translate_lt; auto. |
---|
2569 | Qed. |
---|
2570 | |
---|
2571 | Theorem notbool_isfalse_istrue: |
---|
2572 | forall x, is_false x -> is_true (notbool x). |
---|
2573 | Proof. |
---|
2574 | unfold is_false, is_true, notbool; intros; subst x. |
---|
2575 | simpl. apply one_not_zero. |
---|
2576 | Qed. |
---|
2577 | |
---|
2578 | Theorem notbool_istrue_isfalse: |
---|
2579 | forall x, is_true x -> is_false (notbool x). |
---|
2580 | Proof. |
---|
2581 | unfold is_false, is_true, notbool; intros. |
---|
2582 | generalize (eq_spec x zero). case (eq x zero); intro. |
---|
2583 | contradiction. auto. |
---|
2584 | Qed. |
---|
2585 | |
---|
2586 | Theorem shru_lt_zero: |
---|
2587 | forall x, |
---|
2588 | shru x (repr (Z_of_nat wordsize - 1)) = if lt x zero then one else zero. |
---|
2589 | Proof. |
---|
2590 | intros. rewrite shru_div_two_p. |
---|
2591 | replace (two_p (unsigned (repr (Z_of_nat wordsize - 1)))) |
---|
2592 | with half_modulus. |
---|
2593 | generalize (unsigned_range x); intro. |
---|
2594 | unfold lt. rewrite signed_zero. unfold signed. |
---|
2595 | destruct (zlt (unsigned x) half_modulus). |
---|
2596 | rewrite zlt_false. |
---|
2597 | replace (unsigned x / half_modulus) with 0. reflexivity. |
---|
2598 | symmetry. apply Zdiv_unique with (unsigned x). ring. omega. omega. |
---|
2599 | rewrite zlt_true. |
---|
2600 | replace (unsigned x / half_modulus) with 1. reflexivity. |
---|
2601 | symmetry. apply Zdiv_unique with (unsigned x - half_modulus). ring. |
---|
2602 | rewrite half_modulus_modulus in H. omega. omega. |
---|
2603 | rewrite unsigned_repr. apply half_modulus_power. |
---|
2604 | generalize wordsize_pos wordsize_max_unsigned; omega. |
---|
2605 | Qed. |
---|
2606 | |
---|
2607 | Theorem ltu_range_test: |
---|
2608 | forall x y, |
---|
2609 | ltu x y = true -> unsigned y <= max_signed -> |
---|
2610 | 0 <= signed x < unsigned y. |
---|
2611 | Proof. |
---|
2612 | intros. |
---|
2613 | unfold ltu in H. destruct (zlt (unsigned x) (unsigned y)); try discriminate. |
---|
2614 | rewrite signed_eq_unsigned. |
---|
2615 | generalize (unsigned_range x). omega. omega. |
---|
2616 | Qed. |
---|
2617 | |
---|
2618 | End Make. |
---|
2619 | |
---|
2620 | (** * Specialization to 32-bit integers. *) |
---|
2621 | |
---|
2622 | Module IntWordsize. |
---|
2623 | Definition wordsize := 32%nat. |
---|
2624 | Remark wordsize_not_zero: wordsize <> 0%nat. |
---|
2625 | Proof. unfold wordsize; congruence. Qed. |
---|
2626 | End IntWordsize. |
---|
2627 | |
---|
2628 | Module Int := Make(IntWordsize). |
---|
2629 | |
---|
2630 | Notation int := Int.int. |
---|
2631 | |
---|
2632 | Remark int_wordsize_divides_modulus: |
---|
2633 | Zdivide (Z_of_nat Int.wordsize) Int.modulus. |
---|
2634 | Proof. |
---|
2635 | exists (two_p (32-5)); reflexivity. |
---|
2636 | Qed. |
---|
2637 | *) |
---|
2638 | |
---|
2639 | |
---|
2640 | *) |
---|